[weld-dev] Abstract decorators

[Marius Bogoevici]

Gavin King wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Marius Bogoevici <mariusb at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> Actually, we could just ignore the method (as if it wasn't defined at all)
>> if it is abstract
>>     
>
> The problem is that the decorator class can call itself. It's much
> better if that results in meaningful behavior than a runtime
> exception.
>
>   
Ok, that makes sense. So, just to merge this with what you said on the 
other e-mail thread: we only allow methods that are matching methods on 
the base class to be abstract, case in which we assume that:

abstract void doSomething();

is equivalent to

void doSomething()
{
    delegate.doSomething();
}

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/weld-dev/attachments/20091120/625fd403/attachment.html