[weld-dev] CDI JavaDoc

David Allen drallendc at gmail.com
Sun Oct 25 09:21:40 EDT 2009


Well, there were hundreds of conflicts with all the Event package
documentation I was working on.  I am afraid I don't have any more time
to devote to this.

Since I have little time, I will just work on JIRA issues that are
assigned to me for the next release.

- David

On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 13:17 -0400, Gavin King wrote:
> I'm trying to find time, but distracted by this IBM stuff.
> 
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Yup, this is definitely something, now the spec is basically not going to
> > change again, it is worth putting a lot time into.
> >
> > Gavin, are you able to take a lead on this?
> >
> > On 19 Oct 2009, at 20:34, Gavin King wrote:
> >
> >> OK, folks we got one big, important job before the spec can go final.
> >> We need to re-do the JavaDoc for all the standard APIs.
> >>
> >> Each type needs a complete explanation (perhaps copy/paste from the
> >> spec). The important stuff (everything except for exceptions) needs
> >> examples. We need links between related types (things used together).
> >> We also need to fix all the errors that currently exist.
> >>
> >> I think it's very, very important that this stuff be extremely
> >> well-documented. For many developers, this javadoc will be their very
> >> first contact with JSR-299!
> >>
> >> --
> >> Gavin King
> >> gavin.king at gmail.com
> >> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
> >> http://hibernate.org
> >> http://seamframework.org
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> weld-dev mailing list
> >> weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 



More information about the weld-dev mailing list