[weld-dev] [jsr-299-eg] New spec draft

Gavin King gavin.king at gmail.com
Thu Oct 29 22:29:38 EDT 2009


It used to be 107. It got shorter recently.

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Jay Balunas <tech4j at gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh Man this is close 99 pages....
>
> Please keep it under 100 :-)
>
> -Jay
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> OK then, here's the latest, with app client jar support optional, and
>> some clarification to container lifecycle event observers.
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I might just add a note that containers are not required to support
>> > app client jar bean deployment archives, making it, essentially, an
>> > optional feature.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Roberto Chinnici
>> > <Roberto.Chinnici at sun.com> wrote:
>> >> Apologies, but it looks like I have to take back my previous request
>> >> for app
>> >> client support.
>> >>
>> >> It seems that there are enough issues related to 299 in the Java EE RI
>> >> to
>> >> keep out engineers busy until code freeze. They also told me they
>> >> expect
>> >> more Weld code drops in the coming days and they need to work on
>> >> integrating
>> >> them.
>> >>
>> >> I think we should defer app client support to the next release,
>> >> alongside
>> >> static injection. It's simply not high enough in priority to cause the
>> >> entire release to slip.
>> >>
>> >> So please roll back the change you made to 12.1. I'll figure out what I
>> >> need
>> >> to add to the platform spec to further clarify that 299 support in the
>> >> app
>> >> client is not required.
>> >>
>> >> --Roberto
>> >>
>> >> Gavin King wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Another rev, with support for app client jars added in, as requested.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king at gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> OK folks, here's a new draft with the following changes:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> major changes:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> * moved TypeLiteral/AnnotationLiteral/Nonbinding to
>> >>>> javax.enterprise.util
>> >>>> * @Decorates -> @Inject @Delegate
>> >>>> * added note to 11.3.18 about classes with component defining
>> >>>> annotations
>> >>>>
>> >>>> minor changes:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> * light reorg/rewrite of 5.1-5.3, 8.3-8.4, 9.5 (should not have
>> >>>> changed any semantics)
>> >>>> * fixed a bug in 8.3
>> >>>> * re-added a restriction to 9.3 that got lost at some point
>> >>>> * moved exceptions section to 2.8 and removed lots of forward links
>> >>>> * moved def of injectable references to 6.5.5-6.5.6
>> >>>> * removed appendices, now that the javadoc is almost ready
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I got the spec back down to 99 pages now :-)
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> Gavin King
>> >>>> gavin.king at gmail.com
>> >>>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
>> >>>> http://hibernate.org
>> >>>> http://seamframework.org
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Gavin King
>> > gavin.king at gmail.com
>> > http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
>> > http://hibernate.org
>> > http://seamframework.org
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gavin King
>> gavin.king at gmail.com
>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
>> http://hibernate.org
>> http://seamframework.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> weld-dev mailing list
>> weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>
>
>
> --
> blog: http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Jay
>



-- 
Gavin King
gavin.king at gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org


More information about the weld-dev mailing list