[webbeans-dev] Is @Named qualifier?

[Mark Struberg]

apparently yes:

http://atinject.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/src/javax/inject/Named.java

LieGrue,
strub

--- On Fri, 9/4/09, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Dan Allen <dan.j.allen at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [webbeans-dev] Is @Named qualifier?
> To: "Mark Struberg" <struberg at yahoo.de>
> Cc: "Takeshi Kondo" <takeshi.kondo at gmail.com>, webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Date: Friday, September 4, 2009, 6:36 PM
> @Named is a qualifier in 330? That makes
> absolutely no sense. I think that linkage should be
> severed.
> - Dan Allen
> Sent from my Android-powered G1 phone:
> 
> An open platform for carriers, developers
> 
> and consumers.
> On Sep 4, 2009 8:09 AM,
> "Mark Struberg" <struberg at yahoo.de>
> wrote:
> 
> Oh, we had exact the same discussion over at OpenWebBeans
> today.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> What about re-introducing @BindingType again but making it
> an @Qualifier?
> 
> 
> 
> In fact, JSR-330 @Qualifier says nothing about type safety
> and resolution at all, so this is basically undefined afaik.
> So having a well defined @BindingType again would imho be a
> good thing.
> 
> 
> 
> LieGrue,
> 
> strub
> 
> 
> 
> --- On Wed, 9/2/09, Takeshi Kondo <takeshi.kondo at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > From: Takeshi Kondo <takeshi.kondo at gmail.com>
> 
> > Subject: [webbeans-dev] Is @Named qualifier?
> 
> > To: webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
> 
> > Date: Wednesday, September 2, 2009, 8:45 PM
> 
> > Hi
> > 
> > I'm a bit confused about @Named annotation.
> > @Named is qualifier in jsr-330. However in
> w...
>