[webbeans-dev] Is @Named qualifier?

[Mark Struberg]

But in JSR-330 the @Named has nothing to do with EL! It's really a qualifier like e.g. a JNDI name or a named Spring bean!

LieGrue,
strub

--- On Fri, 9/4/09, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Dan Allen <dan.j.allen at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [webbeans-dev] Is @Named qualifier?
> To: "Mark Struberg" <struberg at yahoo.de>
> Cc: webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org, "Takeshi Kondo" <takeshi.kondo at gmail.com>
> Date: Friday, September 4, 2009, 8:14 PM
> My question was retorical. I don't
> get how it is a qualifier. It violates the whole type-safety
> approach. Having an EL name is orthogonal to having a
> qualifier.
> - Dan Allen
> Sent from my Android-powered G1 phone:
> 
> An open platform for carriers, developers
> 
> and consumers.
> On Sep 4, 2009 1:48 PM,
> "Mark Struberg" <struberg at yahoo.de>
> wrote:
> 
> apparently yes:
> 
> 
> 
> http://atinject.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/src/javax/inject/Named.java
> 
> 
> 
> LieGrue,
> 
> strub
> 
> 
> 
> --- On Fri, 9/4/09, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > From: Dan Allen <dan.j.allen at gmail.com>
> 
> > Subject: Re: [webbeans-dev] Is @Named qualifier?
> 
> > To: "Mark Struberg" <struberg at yahoo.de>
> 
> > Cc: "Takeshi Kondo" <takeshi.kondo at gmail.com>,
> webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
> 
> > Date: Friday, September 4, 2009, 6:36 PM
> 
> > @Named is a qualifier in 330?
> That makes
> > absolutely no sense. I think that linkage should be
> > s...
>