<p>And there lies the problem of trying to use these as common annotations. At this point I defer to Gavin because clearly it must be clarified in the spec. 299 doesn't deal with exposing a bean to JNDI unless I am overlooking something.</p>
<p>- Dan Allen</p>
<p>Sent from my Android-powered G1 phone:<br>
An open platform for carriers, developers<br>
and consumers.</p>
<p><blockquote type="cite">On Sep 4, 2009 2:20 PM, "Mark Struberg" <<a href="mailto:struberg@yahoo.de">struberg@yahoo.de</a>> wrote:<br><br>But in JSR-330 the @Named has nothing to do with EL! It's really a qualifier like e.g. a JNDI name or a named Spring bean!<br>
<p><font color="#500050">
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Fri, 9/4/09, Dan Allen <<a href="mailto:dan.j.allen@gmail.com">dan.j.allen@gmail.com</a>> wrote:
> From: Dan Allen <da...</font></p>> Cc: <a href="mailto:webbeans-dev@lists.jboss.org">webbeans-dev@lists.jboss.org</a>, "Takeshi Kondo" <<a href="mailto:takeshi.kondo@gmail.com">takeshi.kondo@gmail.com</a>><br>
> Date: Friday, September 4, 2009, 8:14 PM<br>
<p><font color="#500050">> My question was retorical. I don't
> get how it is a qualifier. It violates the whole type-safety
...</font></p></blockquote></p>