According to the intro in Chapter 8. Decorators:<br><br>"Decorators may be associated with any managed bean that is not itself an interceptor or decorator or with any EJB session bean."<br><br>Dependent-scoped beans are managed beans, so ergo, they must allow decorators.<br>
<br>I can't provide a use case off the top of my head (just not something my mind is currently chewing on).<br><br>-Dan<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com">gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div><div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><div>Hi;<br><br>
<br>Does the 299 specification indicate that interceptors and decorators should<br>
not be called for dependent scoped beans?<br><br>Currently we do not implement Interceptor/Decorator on @Dependent scoped beans in OWB because we do all interceptor/decorator stuff using proxy and @Dependent scoped beans do not require client proxy. <br>
<br>Does anyone has a good use case/example when dependent scoped beans are useful or necessary?<br><br>Thanks;<br><br>--Gurkan<br><br><br></div></div><br>
</div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
weld-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:weld-dev@lists.jboss.org">weld-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Dan Allen<br>Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action<br>
Registered Linux User #231597<br><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com">http://mojavelinux.com</a><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction">http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction</a><br><a href="http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen">http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen</a><br>