<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Gavin King <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gavin.king@gmail.com">gavin.king@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Look, Dan, trust me, I would have tried to push to have support for<br>
declarative tx management for managed beans in EE 6, but frankly I<br>
already used up every drop of political capital and then some to just<br>
get managed beans with interceptors and dependency injection in. Now<br>
that we have that much, we have a foundation for generalizing<br>
declarative transactions next time around. But we could easily have<br>
ended up with no managed beans at all. So you should be thankful for<br>
what you *do* have.<br></blockquote><div><br>Oh, trust me. I am grateful for what was accomplished and recognize that trying to push for more could have jeopardized the whole thing. I don't mean to question the progress.<br>
<br>All I'm saying is that we need to look ahead and see if we can cover this use case in the next round. So when we go into working on this extension for Seam, it should be with the idea in mind that this should be something that the platform can provide (i.e., a transactional managed bean that can receive an injected persistence context outside of a full container).<br>
<br>-Dan<br></div></div><br>-- <br>Dan Allen<br>Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action<br>Registered Linux User #231597<br><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com">http://mojavelinux.com</a><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction">http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction</a><br>
<a href="http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen">http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen</a><br>