<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Jozef Hartinger <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jharting@redhat.com">jharting@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Jay,<br>
<br>
regarding the checkout/update script, there is one for Seam 3. See <a href="http://seamframework.org/Seam3/CheckOutAndBuildSeam" target="_blank">http://seamframework.org/Seam3/CheckOutAndBuildSeam</a> for details.</blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>Yup - I found that about 15 min after sending the email :-( Thanks though.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div>
<div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On 03/17/2010 03:08 AM, Jay Balunas wrote:<br>
</div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div></div><div class="h5">
Hi All,<br>
<br>
So I'm starting to refactor the RichFaces 4.0 build and I am looking at<br>
what other projects are doing. This includes weld and seam 3 builds (<br>
especially because we have a similar module concept ).<br>
<br>
I'm looking for some lessons learned and what you would change if you<br>
could.<br>
<br>
- Does the single parent pom work well when you have different modules<br>
with very different dependencies?<br>
<br>
- Do you guys have any scripts in your back pocket for making the svn<br>
co/update, and build easier? We have a top level pom that does nothing<br>
but build all our modules from their trunk. Might be worth checking in<br>
( or I might of just missed it ).<br>
<br>
- Dist building - I was thinking of modularizing our dist builds so CDK<br>
could be responsible for building CDK dist, UI would do the same, while<br>
having a top level build put these together into the primary dist. Was<br>
there thoughts of this for weld/seam 3? It appears to me that there is<br>
really only a top level distribution build. I think both have merits,<br>
just wondering what the thoughts were.<br>
<br>
- I know you guys are using ant builds instead of mvn assembly plugin.<br>
Was this just because the assembler sucks, or something else?<br>
<br>
FYI - I think a lot of the build wiki pages are great, and has good<br>
details ( RF needs the same for release process). I made a minor update<br>
to the <a href="http://seamframework.org/Weld/WeldCoreReleases" target="_blank">http://seamframework.org/Weld/WeldCoreReleases</a> page, but agree<br>
with other posts that some of the process is "learn as you go". It is<br>
still much better than many other projects, and I'll help out if I get<br>
the time, but I can't promise anything right now.<br>
<br>
More question to come for sure,<br>
- Jay<br>
<br>
--<br>
blog: <a href="http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Jay" target="_blank">http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Jay</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
weld-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:weld-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">weld-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev</a><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>blog: <a href="http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Jay">http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Jay</a><br>