<a href="https://jira.jboss.org/browse/WELD-718">https://jira.jboss.org/browse/WELD-718</a><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Dan Allen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dan.j.allen@gmail.com">dan.j.allen@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div>Ordering leads more to web-fragment.xml as a solution, since it's possible to have ordering control. There is no guarantee as to when a listener will load that's defined in a TLD (the advantage is only for non-Servlet 3.0 containers). Given that Weld is a new programming model and likely to be used with newer containers, then I'd say we should go with web-fragment.xml.</div>
<div><br></div><div>(Worse case scenario is we introduce a classifier for weld-servlet that will be for pre-Servlet 3.0 environments. Something like org.jboss.weld.servlet:weld-servlet:1.1:pre-servlet-3)</div></blockquote>
</div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Dan Allen<br>Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action<br>Registered Linux User #231597<br><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com" target="_blank">http://mojavelinux.com</a><br>
<a href="http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction" target="_blank">http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction</a><br><a href="http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen</a><br>