<div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Marius Bogoevici <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mariusb@redhat.com">mariusb@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
I think it would be something nice to have. For example, Spring does this via @Configurable, backed by AspectJ.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I've been asked about support for something akin to @Configurable after numerous presentations I've given on CDI. I wasn't quite clear what @Configurable was all about, but now I see. So yes, we could say that this has been a frequently requested feature and would definitely be worth exploring.</div>
<div><br></div><div>...in fact, as I was walking today, I thought to myself "is the new keyword dead? what was it like when we had to use it?". This brings everything back full circle so that you can still create objects in the classic way, but benefit from modern programming model patterns. Quite brilliant.</div>
<div><br></div><div>-Dan</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br><div>Dan Allen</div>Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action<br>Registered Linux User #231597<br><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com" target="_blank">http://mojavelinux.com</a><br>
<a href="http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction" target="_blank">http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction</a><br><a href="http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen</a><br>