Just created <a href="https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-36">https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-36</a> to address the issue of ObserverMethods not receiving the event qualifiers when they are notified of an event. This is needed to completely bridge the gap between CDI events and JMS.<div>
<br></div><div>- Jordan<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Pete Muir <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pmuir@redhat.com">pmuir@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Hi all<br>
<br>
I'm currently trawling the weld-dev archive to find issues and ideas for CDI 1.1 (the next release of the CDI specification) that have been raised but not filed in <a href="https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI" target="_blank">https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI</a>.<br>
<br>
Anyone want to volunteer to do the same for the forums and <a href="http://in.relation.to" target="_blank">in.relation.to</a> (and any other blogs they can find?). Mail me if you do and we can make sure that people don't overlap.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Pete<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
weld-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:weld-dev@lists.jboss.org">weld-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Jordan Ganoff<br>
</div>