<div dir="ltr">Thank you Jozef for your quick reply!<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Jozef Hartinger <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jharting@redhat.com" target="_blank">jharting@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Weld 2.2 should be run against CDI 1.2 TCK. There were changes
between CDI 1.1 and 1.2 due to which it won't pass CDI 1.1 TCK
entirely.<div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<div>On 05/22/2015 10:55 AM, Emily Jiang
wrote:<br>
</div>
</div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="h5">
<div dir="ltr">In the past, I talked to Jozef/Martin regarding
whether Weld 2.2.x runs against CDI 1.1 cts or CDI 1.2 cts. If I
can remember correctly, I was told Weld 2.2.x runs against CDI
1.2 cts only. <br>
<br>
Can someone confirm whether you expect Weld 2.2.x passes CDI 1.1
cts as well or you have stopped maintaining CDI 1.1 cts and only
runs against CDI 1.2 cts? <br>
<br>
We found the same test does different things between CDI 1.1 cts
and CDI 1.2 cts.<br clear="all">
<div>
<div><br>
-- <br>
<div>Thanks<br>
Emily<br>
=================<br>
Emily Jiang<br>
<a href="mailto:ejiang@apache.org" target="_blank">ejiang@apache.org</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
</div></div><pre>_______________________________________________
weld-dev mailing list
<a href="mailto:weld-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">weld-dev@lists.jboss.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">Thanks<br>Emily<br>=================<br>Emily Jiang<br><a href="mailto:ejiang@apache.org" target="_blank">ejiang@apache.org</a><br></div>
</div>