<font size=2 face="sans-serif">No, Martin. I am talking about the new
maintenance release of Interceptor spec, JSR318. The sentence as per my
email is on page 32.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Many thanks,<br>
Emily<br>
===========================<br>
Emily Jiang<br>
WebSphere Application Server, CDI & MicroProfile Development Lead</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> <br>
MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN<br>
Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278<br>
<br>
Email: emijiang@uk.ibm.com <br>
Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB<br>
</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">From:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Martin Kouba <mkouba@redhat.com></font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">To:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Emily Jiang <EMIJIANG@uk.ibm.com>,
weld-dev <weld-dev@lists.jboss.org></font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Date:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">01/06/2017 10:09</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Subject:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Re: [weld-dev]
Interceptor & Interceptors</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Sent by:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">weld-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org</font>
<br>
<hr noshade>
<br>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2>Hi Emily,<br>
<br>
I suppose you're talking about section 5.3 Ordering Interceptors using
<br>
the Priority Annotation:<br>
"The Priority annotation is ignored on interceptors bound to a component
<br>
using the Interceptors annotation."<br>
<br>
There is a very old clarification issue for the interceptor spec:<br>
</font></tt><a href="https://github.com/javaee/interceptors-spec/issues/23"><tt><font size=2>https://github.com/javaee/interceptors-spec/issues/23</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2><br>
(originally INTERCEPTORS_SPEC-23)<br>
<br>
Martin<br>
<br>
Dne 31.5.2017 v 14:53 Emily Jiang napsal(a):<br>
> Hi Martin,<br>
> <br>
> In the updated Interceptor spec, it has the following statement:<br>
> <br>
> "The Interceptor annotation is ignored on interceptor classes
bound <br>
> using the Interceptorsannotation."<br>
> <br>
> I assume this already the case in Weld 2.x, CDI 1.2 implementation.
Right?<br>
> <br>
> Many thanks,<br>
> Emily<br>
> ===========================<br>
> Emily Jiang<br>
> WebSphere Application Server, CDI & MicroProfile Development Lead<br>
> <br>
> MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN<br>
> Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278<br>
> <br>
> Email: emijiang@uk.ibm.com<br>
> Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB<br>
> <br>
> Unless stated otherwise above:<br>
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
number <br>
> 741598.<br>
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
PO6 3AU<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> weld-dev mailing list<br>
> weld-dev@lists.jboss.org<br>
> </font></tt><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev"><tt><font size=2>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2><br>
> <br>
<br>
-- <br>
Martin Kouba<br>
Senior Software Engineer<br>
Red Hat, Czech Republic<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
weld-dev mailing list<br>
weld-dev@lists.jboss.org<br>
</font></tt><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev"><tt><font size=2>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2><br>
<br>
</font></tt>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
Unless stated otherwise above:<br>
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. <br>
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU<br>
</font>