<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 1:27 AM Matej Novotny <<a href="mailto:manovotn@redhat.com">manovotn@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Once again, please post questions like these to weld-dev mailing list.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Fair. Thanks for answering.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
To answer you, I think both of the predicates would be illegal bean types.<br>
It doesn't matter if you actually "hide" the wildcard inside another parameter type. <br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>OK, so "contains" truly means "contains": as the type is navigated, any occurrence of a wildcard encountered is illegal, no matter how "deep".</div><div><br></div><div>And this is because why, exactly? I'm sure there's a reason; my slow brain is just not seeing it this morning.</div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div>Laird</div></div></div>