[wildfly-dev] Package name

[Tomaž Cerar]

Sounds ok,

probably having org.wildfly.extension.<>

that would too much :)


On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:07 PM, David M. Lloyd <david.lloyd at redhat.com>wrote:

> Maybe do:
>
>    org.wildfly.subsystem.<blah>
>
> because there will be wildfly stuff which isn't subsystems and which
> might have names that conflict.  I'd even suggest
> "org.wildfly.as.subsystem..." but that might be too much.
>
> On 04/29/2013 08:58 AM, Tomaž Cerar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > What should be package name for new stuff being added to WildFly?
> >
> > org.wildfly.<subsystem-name>
> > or
> > org.wildfly.as <http://org.wildfly.as>.<subsystem-name>
> > or something else?
> >
> > I would go for org.wildfly.<subsystem-name>
> >
> >
> >
> > this mostly applies to new subsystems and as we agreed we won't rename
> > packages for existing code until it break compatibility.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > tomaz
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > wildfly-dev mailing list
> > wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
> >
>
>
> --
> - DML
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/attachments/20130429/f2d1498f/attachment.html