[wildfly-dev] manifest.mf jboss-deployment-structure.xml order of precedence

[Stuart Douglas]

Don't do that.

Pretty sure the remove will take precedence but I don't think this is
something we should consider supported behavior.

Stuart


On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Rebecca Searls <rsearls at redhat.com> wrote:

>
> What if manifest.mf adds a dependency and jboss-deployment-structure.xml
> removes it?
> Is manifest.mf processes first?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Stuart Douglas" <stuart.w.douglas at gmail.com>
> > To: "Rebecca Searls" <rsearls at redhat.com>
> > Cc: wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 11:37:19 AM
> > Subject: Re: [wildfly-dev] manifest.mf jboss-deployment-structure.xml
> order of precedence
> >
> > If both are present both sets of dependencies will be added to the
> > deployment.
> >
> > Stuart
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Rebecca Searls <rsearls at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Is there are order of precedence if both a manifest.mf
> > > jboss-deployment-structure.xml
> > > are present in an archive?  Does one override the other?
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > wildfly-dev mailing list
> > > wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
> > >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/attachments/20130815/c8db78e3/attachment.html