[wildfly-dev] Put MyFaces JSF into WildFly?

[Emmanuel Bernard]

It's not my domain of expertise but I hear about the subject from time
to time.

When polling people about this subject, people actually do like the
choice JBoss AS has offered in this area. Sometimes, a specific bug in
one impl is really problematic for a project and the ability to switch
has been a life saver.

So even if we don't "ship" with it, we should have it "integratable" and
fully tested in our releases.

Emmanuel

On Mon 2013-07-08 16:24, Andrig Miller wrote:
> I think if we should see what product management thinks about his, in terms of the choice.  Do we have customers on EAP that are demanding this?
> 
> Andy
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: ssilvert at redhat.com
> > To: "Andrig Miller" <anmiller at redhat.com>
> > Cc: wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org, "Burr Sutter" <bsutter at redhat.com>, "Brian Leathem" <bleathem at redhat.com>
> > Sent: Monday, July 8, 2013 1:18:29 PM
> > Subject: Re: [wildfly-dev] Put MyFaces JSF into WildFly?
> > 
> > I should have added, I personally have no problem supporting both in
> > EAP
> > if that's what we decide to do.
> > 
> > JSF is kind of unique in that for many years there have been two
> > well-accepted implementations.  Both have their strengths and
> > weaknesses.  Neither is going away.
> > 
> > So the upside of shipping both is that we would be the only ones
> > providing a choice.  Developers could even defer their choice of
> > implementations until after their application is finished.  Then pick
> > the one that runs best for them.
> > 
> > On 7/8/2013 2:50 PM, Andrig Miller wrote:
> > > My personal opinion on this, is that we should not ship two
> > > implementations.  I know this is in the community, so it doesn't
> > > cause any issue with support as we don't have to ship both in EAP.
> > >  Having said that, if people in the community adopt MyFaces, and
> > > then move to EAP, and its not there, its just another thing that
> > > causes a problem for adoption of EAP.
> > >
> > > Andy
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> From: ssilvert at redhat.com
> > >> To: wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > >> Sent: Monday, July 8, 2013 11:31:27 AM
> > >> Subject: [wildfly-dev] Put MyFaces JSF into WildFly?
> > >>
> > >> Ever since we switched from MyFaces to Mojarra I've incurred the
> > >> wrath
> > >> of MyFaces fans.  Regardless of the relative quality of each
> > >> implementation, we have stuck with Mojarra because it always
> > >> implements
> > >> the latest spec long before MyFaces.  Now is no exception as
> > >> Mojarra
> > >> fully supports JSF 2.2 and MyFaces 2.2 is incomplete.
> > >>
> > >> However, with Multi-JSF in place, it is now trivial to ship both
> > >> implementations and allow the end user to choose which one they
> > >> like
> > >> best.
> > >>
> > >> Any thoughts on this?
> > >>
> > >> Stan
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> wildfly-dev mailing list
> > >> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
> > >>
> > 
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev