[wildfly-dev] Issue with HTTP upgrade for remote naming on OpenShift?

Jason T. Greene jgreene at redhat.com
Wed Feb 19 08:34:54 EST 2014


The JMS 2 direct connect should work though right? If so maybe we should convert the QuickStart?

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 19, 2014, at 2:15 AM, Jeff Mesnil <jmesnil at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 18 Feb 2014, at 22:19, Farah Juma <fjuma at redhat.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I'm looking into this as well to see if there's a way to make this work. When using port forwarding, I'm finding that an error still occurs:
> 
> At this stage, port forwarding works. Thanks Farah.
> 
> The remaining issue is the way HornetQ configures its connectors.
> 
> HornetQ connectors are the bits that are retrieved using JNDI and contains the informations to connect to the HornetQ server (embedded with WildFly in our case).
> The ugly ugly part of it is that the connector must know the host of the server to connect to.
> In WildFly, we resolve the socket-binding (http in this case) to get this address[1]. When using OpenShift, the HornetQ connectors will use the OpenShift server address (127.5.118.129).
> If I use port forwarding, the remote naming will work and I will retrieve a connector that wants to connect to 127.5.118.129 from my local machine and this does not work.
> 
> The HornetQ team has some features planned for the cloud. I’ll let them know about this.
> 
> [1] https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/blob/master/messaging/src/main/java/org/jboss/as/messaging/HornetQService.java#L181
> 
> -- 
> Jeff Mesnil
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://jmesnil.net/
> 



More information about the wildfly-dev mailing list