[wildfly-dev] WFLY-4200 WAR MDB cannot obtain superclass on module classpath

Eduardo Sant´Ana da Silva eduardo.santanadasilva at gmail.com
Fri Dec 4 07:23:58 EST 2015


Stuart,

Could be something related to that?

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-4200



2015-07-01 3:12 GMT-03:00 Stuart Douglas <stuart.w.douglas at gmail.com>:

> I think the solution here is to just move this to a later phase, where it
> can be changed to use reflection.
>
> Stuart
>
> On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 at 02:52 Eduardo Sant´Ana da Silva <
> eduardo.santanadasilva at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello, I'm planning to do something regarding  WFLY-4200, I've sent an
>> e-mail a few months ago about that and I will need some clarifications.
>>
>> I don't know if I'm right, but I'm seeing a big problem with that if this
>> is really a bug. What other checks are being done that cause the deployment
>> abort in the other phases before resolving the dependencies that could be
>> turn the deployment in a qualified one?
>>
>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-4200
>>
>> Regards,
>> Eduardo Sant'Ana da Silva
>>
>> 2015-05-02 19:23 GMT-03:00 Eduardo Sant´Ana da Silva <
>> eduardo.santanadasilva at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> I was looking at :WFLY-4200 WAR MDB cannot obtain superclass on module
>>> classpath
>>>
>>> This is what I posted about it:
>>>
>>>
>>> "I believe that the problem is because
>>> AnnotatedEJBComponentDescriptionDeploymentUnitProcessor executes in the
>>> parse phase:
>>>
>>> Phase.PARSE,Phase.PARSE_CREATE_COMPONENT_DESCRIPTIONS
>>>
>>> Since the dependencies will be resolved at  Phase.DEPENDENCIES, your
>>> build will not work.
>>> Regarding WFLY, my suggestion is not throw the
>>> EjbLogger.ROOT_LOGGER.mdbDoesNotImplementNorSpecifyMessageListener(beanClass)
>>> only bring up some flag that the required interfaces were not yet resolved,
>>> some attachment could be useful, just to retain the super class name. When
>>> the dependencies were solved, the class will be present on the class index
>>> and the test against the annotation should be performed again. Since that
>>> work will be done twice, to verify the required interfaces, this requires
>>> some experts advice."
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> --
>>> __________________________
>>> Eduardo Sant'Ana da Silva
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>
>


-- 
__________________________
Eduardo Sant'Ana da Silva - Dr.
Pesquisador / Consultor de TI
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/attachments/20151204/2cc9afaf/attachment.html 


More information about the wildfly-dev mailing list