[wildfly-dev] [keycloak-dev] 2 places to edit modules now?

Stan Silvert ssilvert at redhat.com
Tue Jun 16 09:24:50 EDT 2015


On 6/16/2015 8:36 AM, Tomaž Cerar wrote:
> A feature-pack can extend another feature pack,
> I am sure you guys know that.
>
> so you could have "keycloak-base" feature pack that all other 3 extend.
>
> the base would than have all common modules defined.
> and other 3 extra specializations.
That's an OK approach if there is a well-defined base of modules that 
several projects use.   But that's really not the case.

In any feature pack I should be able to just list the artifacts I'm 
using and it provides a default module.xml file for that.
>
> --
> tomaz
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Stan Silvert <ssilvert at redhat.com 
> <mailto:ssilvert at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     Cross-posting to wildfly-dev.
>
>     It sounds like we need a way to standardize module.xml definitions
>     across projects and have them accessible from maven GAV's.  These
>     module.xml files are rarely different between projects and it doesn't
>     make sense for each feature pack to define its own copy.
>
>     On 6/15/2015 4:08 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
>     > Module definition is now done in 3 places?  Copies of one another?
>     >
>     > eap6-service-overlay
>     > server-feature-pack
>     > adapter-feature-pack
>     >
>     > This is very very error prone guys.  I guarantee somebody will
>     forget to
>     > update something.
>     >
>     >
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     wildfly-dev mailing list
>     wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/attachments/20150616/5e01dadb/attachment.html 


More information about the wildfly-dev mailing list