[wildfly-dev] Embedded Arquillian Container

Cody Lerum cody.lerum at gmail.com
Mon May 4 07:35:15 EDT 2015


Is there a good example published somewhere for users who want to use a
managed container within a CI like Travis?

This is becoming an increasingly pretty popular configuration, and the
easier for the users to get started and update from release to release the
better.

-C
On May 4, 2015 3:28 AM, "Lukas Fryc" <lfryc at redhat.com> wrote:

> An only embedded container's advantage over managed container is a simpler
> test debugging - no special setup required.
>
> I'm fine with dropping it, just in case it wasn't intentional decision to
> remove embedded container, we can re-introduce it.
>
> ~ Lukas
>
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Brian Stansberry <
> brian.stansberry at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Lukas,
>>
>> On 4/29/15 9:58 AM, Lukas Fryc wrote:
>> > Hey guys,
>> >
>> > just wondering if wildfly-arquillian-container-embedded was discontinued
>> > with split of 9.x:
>> >
>> > https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-arquillian/blob/master/pom.xml#L96
>> >
>>
>> It was, yes, as wildfly-arquillian shouldn't depend on WildFly Full (to
>> avoid a circular dependency) and WildFly Core didn't have an embedding
>> module.
>> >
>> > When working on a re-enablement, I found out that even though arq
>> > adapter now depends on wildfly-core/embedded, particularly
>> > on EmbeddedServerFactory, this class has its counterpart in
>> > wildfly/embedded as well.
>> >
>>
>> I added the wildfly-core/embedded module in order to support the Offline
>> CLI.[1]  At this point I consider it to be an internal module, not
>> public API. I expect that will soften over time, but for WildFly Core
>> 1.0 / WildFly Full 9.0 at least, that's what it is.
>>
>> [1] http://wildfly.org/news/2015/03/13/Offline-CLI/
>>
>> > Question is, should be embedded arquillian container still available for
>> > 9.x?
>> >
>>
>> Jason Greene would need to rule on that, but I know we were ok with
>> dropping it before. Is there much use of it?
>>
>> > If yes, I can continue and provide a PR, just I will need a bit of
>> > guidance with what EmbeddedServerFactory it should actually use (if that
>> > matters).
>> >
>>
>> What API would it need from wildfly-core/embedded? Is the
>> StandaloneServer API there adequate?
>>
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > ~ Lukas
>> >
>> > --
>> > Lukas Fryc
>> > AeroGear Core Developer
>> > Red Hat
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > wildfly-dev mailing list
>> > wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Brian Stansberry
>> Senior Principal Software Engineer
>> JBoss by Red Hat
>> _______________________________________________
>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/attachments/20150504/9dd83817/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the wildfly-dev mailing list