[wildfly-dev] Embedded Arquillian Container

[Tomaž Cerar]

Guys,

I've sent PR https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-arquillian/pull/18 that
adds back embedded arquillian container
which uses wildfly-core embedded api.

--
tomaz

On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Cody Lerum <cody.lerum at gmail.com> wrote:

> Is there a good example published somewhere for users who want to use a
> managed container within a CI like Travis?
>
> This is becoming an increasingly pretty popular configuration, and the
> easier for the users to get started and update from release to release the
> better.
>
> -C
> On May 4, 2015 3:28 AM, "Lukas Fryc" <lfryc at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> An only embedded container's advantage over managed container is a
>> simpler test debugging - no special setup required.
>>
>> I'm fine with dropping it, just in case it wasn't intentional decision to
>> remove embedded container, we can re-introduce it.
>>
>> ~ Lukas
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Brian Stansberry <
>> brian.stansberry at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Lukas,
>>>
>>> On 4/29/15 9:58 AM, Lukas Fryc wrote:
>>> > Hey guys,
>>> >
>>> > just wondering if wildfly-arquillian-container-embedded was
>>> discontinued
>>> > with split of 9.x:
>>> >
>>> > https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-arquillian/blob/master/pom.xml#L96
>>> >
>>>
>>> It was, yes, as wildfly-arquillian shouldn't depend on WildFly Full (to
>>> avoid a circular dependency) and WildFly Core didn't have an embedding
>>> module.
>>> >
>>> > When working on a re-enablement, I found out that even though arq
>>> > adapter now depends on wildfly-core/embedded, particularly
>>> > on EmbeddedServerFactory, this class has its counterpart in
>>> > wildfly/embedded as well.
>>> >
>>>
>>> I added the wildfly-core/embedded module in order to support the Offline
>>> CLI.[1]  At this point I consider it to be an internal module, not
>>> public API. I expect that will soften over time, but for WildFly Core
>>> 1.0 / WildFly Full 9.0 at least, that's what it is.
>>>
>>> [1] http://wildfly.org/news/2015/03/13/Offline-CLI/
>>>
>>> > Question is, should be embedded arquillian container still available
>>> for
>>> > 9.x?
>>> >
>>>
>>> Jason Greene would need to rule on that, but I know we were ok with
>>> dropping it before. Is there much use of it?
>>>
>>> > If yes, I can continue and provide a PR, just I will need a bit of
>>> > guidance with what EmbeddedServerFactory it should actually use (if
>>> that
>>> > matters).
>>> >
>>>
>>> What API would it need from wildfly-core/embedded? Is the
>>> StandaloneServer API there adequate?
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> >
>>> > ~ Lukas
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Lukas Fryc
>>> > AeroGear Core Developer
>>> > Red Hat
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > wildfly-dev mailing list
>>> > wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Brian Stansberry
>>> Senior Principal Software Engineer
>>> JBoss by Red Hat
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>>> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/attachments/20150504/11d1932c/attachment.html