[wildfly-dev] Managed exploded deployments

James Perkins jperkins at redhat.com
Fri Jun 10 17:20:37 EDT 2016


On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 7:24 AM, Emmanuel Hugonnet <ehugonne at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Some details on the current implementation :
> * the add-content will overwrite existing content so there is no
> update-content
> updating instead of just adding means having the state on the client as
> well as on the server which would require more checks to keep those
> in sync for no real value from my point of view.
>

I think there should be a force attribute, or something along those lines,
that can be changed to indicate an add shouldn't override. It can default
to false, but there are probably scenarios where you would want an add to
fail of the content already exists.


> * the add-content/remove-content work with a list of contents thus for an
> IDE we don't have to create a bunch of ops to upload or delete
> each change.
> * you can start from an 'empty' deployment and add contents to it step by
> step
>
> Emmanuel
>
>
> On 10/06/2016 15:38, Brian Stansberry wrote:
> > Emmanuel Hugonnet has been working on a long requested feature to have
> > WildFly support "managed exploded deployments." We have a requirements
> > analysis doc for this at https://developer.jboss.org/docs/DOC-55497 and
> > I just wanted to point that out to the list so anyone interested can
> > have a look, and comment on this thread or on the document.
> >
> > A managed deployment is one where the user provided content is copied by
> > the server/host controller into its internal content repo and then
> > thereafter that copy is what is used. I estimate that 99%+ of all zipped
> > deployments in WildFly are managed. With an unmanaged deployment the
> > user provides the server with the local FS path to the content and then
> > the server directly uses that content. All exploded deployments are
> > unmanaged, as we don't support managed yet.
> >
> > We propose to add 5 new operations to the deployment resource:
> >
> > explode (to convert and archive deployment to exploded)
> > add-content
> > update-content
> > remove-content
> > read-content
> >
> > There is one "nice-to-have" requirement listed on the doc where I'm
> > increasingly thinking it needs to be a hard requirement, so thought on
> > this are appreciated:
> >
> >
> > "The explode operation can take an optional path parameter, the value of
> > which is a path within the deployment that should be exploded.
> >      * The use case for this is scenarios like an exploded ear that
> > contains an unexploded war, and then the user later wishes the war to be
> > exploded.
> >      * This is much closer to a hard requirement if the nice-to-have
> > requirement for recursively exploding is not supported.
> >      * This operation will fail if the content referred to by the path
> > parameter is already exploded or is not a zip file.
> >      * This operation will fail if any content between the root of the
> > deployment and the content referred to by the path parameter is an
> > unexploded archive.
> >          * So,
> > /deployment=foo.ear:explode(path=/thewar.war/WEB-INF/lib/thejar.jar)
> > would fail if thewar.war hadn't previously been exploded."
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>



-- 
James R. Perkins
JBoss by Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/attachments/20160610/ddc20c51/attachment.html 


More information about the wildfly-dev mailing list