[wildfly-dev] A look at Eclipse MicroProfile Healthcheck

[Jeff Mesnil]

> On 7 Jul 2017, at 14:22, Heiko Rupp <hrupp at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On 6 Jul 2017, at 21:00, Heiko Braun wrote:
>> Maybe we should change that to support multiple protocol entry points? These could either be custom ones or defined in the spec. For instance rather then having /health, we could introduce /live and /ready. The api underneath however would remain the same.
> 
> I think only keeping /health and adding a parameter
> is better, as it "pollutes" less the namespace of urls
> left to applications.

Related issues to improve the spec that are relevant to this conversation.

* Provide different types of health check - https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-health/issues/35
* Health check endpoint should have app name - https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-health/issues/29

jeff

-- 
Jeff Mesnil
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://jmesnil.net/