[wildfly-dev] Apache Portable Runtime (APR) in Wildfly

[Peter Nalyvayko]

Hi Andy,
Thanks for clarifying. Is there off chance a document or a chart with
performance metrics comparing NIO in Undertow vs native connectors with
respect to SSL?
Regards,
Peter

On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Andrig Miller <anmiller at redhat.com> wrote:

> Also, we don't recommend using the native connections anymore.  Since EAP
> 6.1, we have had an NIO2 based connector that is better than the native
> connector, and with EAP 7 we have Undertow (no need to have anything else).
>
> Andy
>
> On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Stuart Douglas <stuart.w.douglas at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> APR was required to use the native connectors in JBoss Web. It is not
>> required when using Undertow.
>>
>> Stuart
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Peter Nalyvayko <brat000012001 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Not sure if this is the right mailing list to post the question. Does
>>> Wildfly support Apache Portable Runtime? I've found some old discussions
>>> about configuring APR in JBoss Web/JBoss EAP that go a few years back, but
>>> nothing as far as Wildfly/APR  support goes. A reference to a section in
>>> the documentation explicitly stating that such and such technology is not
>>> supported is really what I am after.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> --Peter
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>>> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Andrig (Andy) T. Miller
> Global Platform Director, Middleware
> Red Hat, Inc.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/attachments/20170307/7d9304b5/attachment-0001.html