[wildfly-dev] Wildfly layers

Jean-Francois Denise jdenise at redhat.com
Wed Dec 5 08:51:32 EST 2018


Darran,

elytron seems to have a dependency on picketbox for jacc support. Am I 
right?


On 05/12/2018 12:04, Darran Lofthouse wrote:
> Yes we can remove it entirely ;-)
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 11:13 PM Carlo de Wolf <cdewolf at redhat.com 
> <mailto:cdewolf at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 04-12-18 23:15, Brian Stansberry wrote:
>>
>>         Picketbox layer
>>
>>         Because we want at some point to get rid-off this dependency,
>>         I am
>>         wandering if we should really define a layer for it. Could be
>>         that any
>>         dependency on it would imply the use of legacy-security
>>         layer. Picketbox
>>         is implicit when legacy-security layer is provisioned.
>>
>>
>>     The independent use is the management vault. Using that shouldn't
>>     require everything in the current p-b module though. And arguably
>>     you could say that use case means you need the vault tool and
>>     thus whatever layer has it. (You don't need the vault tool
>>     though, not on the server.)
>>
>     Can we change the management vault somehow to not need PicketBox
>     at all anymore?
>
>     Carlo
>     _______________________________________________
>     wildfly-dev mailing list
>     wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/attachments/20181205/04fe031d/attachment.html 


More information about the wildfly-dev mailing list