<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Vaclav Tunka <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:vtunka@redhat.com" target="_blank">vtunka@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":dl2" class="a3s" style="overflow:hidden">My impression is Keycloak does not belong into the categories<br>
above, but maybe I don't know all the details.</div></blockquote></div><br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">You don't have all details, but your reasoning is completely sound.<br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">
Idea is to have keycloak auth mechanism as an option to have SSO for admin console.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">But that doesn't mean it needs all those dependencies in the core.<br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">
We need to distinguish between, auth mechanism that should go to domain-http<br>and keycloak subsystem which is completely different beast and should go to probably full distro.<br><br>--<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">
tomaz<br></div></div>