<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Brian Stansberry <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:brian.stansberry@redhat.com" target="_blank">brian.stansberry@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
Does logging belong in web then then? Still seems like something that<br>
even the uber-minimalists would want. I ask because it bugs me that we<br>
have two meanings now for "core" -- the old "core" notion that was the<br>
true core with zero subsystems, and now this new wildfly-core dist,<br>
which has subsystems.</blockquote></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Core *current* comes with following subsystems:<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">- logging<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">- jmx (on the way out)<br>
</div><div class="gmail_extra">- deployment-scanner<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">- remoting<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">- io (because of remoting)<br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">I agree that jmx needs to go out, <br>
</div><div class="gmail_extra">deployment scanner needs to stay.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">And remoting is needed to make cli & alike work...</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div></div>