<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01/28/2015 11:26 PM, Tomaž Cerar
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAMquZP432V9N-txRRcBNtdHzvsofPK6VZtW00kB8cf-mx=aMzA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>1) no, latest 8.x jars will handle all previous
              versions just fine<br>
            </div>
            2) not really just one thing that could cause this, but we
            did fix few remoting &amp; xnio things in 8.1<br>
            <br>
          </div>
          on general principal we test all code under ipv6 which is used
          also by our PR CI jobs.<br>
          <br>
        </div>
        also i would recommend you to go with 8.2.0.Final artifacts<br>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Will do, thanks!<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAMquZP432V9N-txRRcBNtdHzvsofPK6VZtW00kB8cf-mx=aMzA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div class="gmail_extra">
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Rob
          Stryker <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:rstryker@redhat.com" target="_blank">rstryker@redhat.com</a>&gt;</span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi all:<br>
            <br>
            JBT is considering updating the following client jar
            versions for<br>
            communication with all wildfly streams 8.x over management
            api:<br>
            <br>
            marshalling from 1.4.3 to 1.4.9<br>
            remoting from 4.0.0 to 4.0.9<br>
            xnio from 3.2.0 to 3.3.0<br>
            protocol from 8.0.0 to 8.2.0.CR1<br>
            controller-client from 8.0.0 to 8.2.0.CR1<br>
            <br>
            The cause for this is that when using the current jars,
            executing<br>
            management tasks with ip6 hosts fails against all wf8.x
            servers.  So<br>
            far, updating the jars has passed our smoke tests.<br>
            <br>
            Two questions:<br>
            <br>
            1) Are there any known incompatibilities for those new jar
            versions with<br>
            any wf8.0 or higher? ie, should this new set of jars be able
            to<br>
            communicate flawlessly with wf8.0 through 8.2?<br>
            <br>
            2) This one's more of a curiousity, but does anyone know
            what caused the<br>
            8.0 jars to fail against all servers for management over
            ip6? I've<br>
            combed through jira and git logs a bit but nothing really
            jumped out at me.<br>
            <br>
            Answers to these two questions would increase our confidence
            in bumping<br>
            the jars more than simple smoke tests.<br>
            <span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
                - Rob Stryker<br>
                _______________________________________________<br>
                wildfly-dev mailing list<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org">wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev"
                  target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev</a><br>
              </font></span></blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>