<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On May 28, 2015, at 11:09 AM, Steve Ebersole <<a href="mailto:steve@hibernate.org" class="">steve@hibernate.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Jason Greene <span dir="ltr" class=""><<a href="mailto:jason.greene@redhat.com" target="_blank" class="">jason.greene@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:</div><div class="gmail_quote"><br class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Does 5 have significant TCK impacting changes? I heard there was work on a new query engine, but don’t remember if that was for 5 or the future.</blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">There *should not* be. Of course, proof in always in the pudding :) </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">The new query engine (its actually more ambitious than "just" the query engine) is a future roadmap item.</div></div></div></div>
</div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div><br class=""></div><div>Ah ok, In that case I think we should just try to merge it (when Scott has the WF test suite passing) and then chase down TCK regressions after. Hopefully that makes it better for everyone.</div><br class=""><div class="">
--<br class="">Jason T. Greene<br class="">WildFly Lead / JBoss EAP Platform Architect<br class="">JBoss, a division of Red Hat
</div>
<br class=""></body></html>