<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">IMO this feature should be oriented to sysadmins not just developers. Is there really added value for developers to use HTTPS or HTTPS/2?<br><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">It should be easy for sysadmins to setup TLS/SSL with "production" quality, from the gereration of the CSR that has to be send to the CA to the generation of the keystore.<br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">BTW... how is the performance of HTTPS using pure Java vs Apache for example? is this feature oriented for developers because for use in production is not recommended?<br></div><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><b><br><span style="color:rgb(7,55,99)">Ing. Jorge Solórzano</span></b><br></span></div><span style="color:rgb(11,83,148)"><span style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><a href="https://about.me/jorsol?promo=email_sig&utm_source=email_sig&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=external_links" target="_blank"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><font size="1">about.me/jorsol</font></span></a></span></span><br></div></div></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Tomaž Cerar <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tomaz.cerar@gmail.com" target="_blank">tomaz.cerar@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>This is completely off topic for this thread, there was one earlier about what should go into 10.x....<br><br></div>Anywho, issue you mention was already resolved and hibernate updated in master some time ago.<br></div>which means it will be in next release, whatever that release will be.<br><br>--<br></div>tomaz<br></div><div class=""><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Harold Campbell <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hcamp@muerte.net" target="_blank">hcamp@muerte.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span>On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 09:22 +1000, Stuart Douglas wrote:<br>
> Hi All,<br>
><br>
> I would like to propose that we add support for HTTP/2 out of the box<br>
> in Wildfly 10.1.<br>
><br>
<br>
</span>This lowly user desperately wants a release containing the fix to WFLY-<br>
6283 sooner rather than later. I'm sure other people have other pet<br>
bugs awaiting release.<br>
<br>
I have no opinion on HTTP/2 being added other than to ask that pent up<br>
bug fixes be kept in mind.<br>
<span><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Harold Campbell <<a href="mailto:hcamp@muerte.net" target="_blank">hcamp@muerte.net</a>><br>
<br>
Roses are red;<br>
Violets are blue.<br>
I'm schizophrenic,<br>
And so am I.<br>
</font></span><div><div><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
wildfly-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev</a></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
wildfly-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org">wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>