<div dir="ltr">We could also imagine the user will only install Elytron and there will be no such thing as PicketBox at some point.</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 1:58 PM Jean-Francois Denise <<a href="mailto:jdenise@redhat.com">jdenise@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>The subsystem. So we could imagine that user would install both
elytron and picketbox.<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="m_-5392829916571231353moz-cite-prefix">On 05/12/2018 14:56, Darran Lofthouse
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Do you mean Elytron or the Elytron Subsystem?
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I believe yes the subsystem does have that dependency but
it is only temporary until PicketBox is removed.</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 1:51 PM Jean-Francois
Denise <<a href="mailto:jdenise@redhat.com" target="_blank">jdenise@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Darran,</p>
<p>elytron seems to have a dependency on picketbox for jacc
support. Am I right?<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="m_-5392829916571231353m_-349035413589913523moz-cite-prefix">On
05/12/2018 12:04, Darran Lofthouse wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Yes we can remove it entirely ;-)</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 11:13 PM Carlo de
Wolf <<a href="mailto:cdewolf@redhat.com" target="_blank">cdewolf@redhat.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> On 04-12-18
23:15, Brian Stansberry wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Picketbox layer<br>
<br>
Because we want at some point to get rid-off
this dependency, I am <br>
wandering if we should really define a layer for
it. Could be that any <br>
dependency on it would imply the use of
legacy-security layer. Picketbox <br>
is implicit when legacy-security layer is
provisioned.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default">The independent use is
the management vault. Using that shouldn't
require everything in the current p-b module
though. And arguably you could say that use case
means you need the vault tool and thus whatever
layer has it. (You don't need the vault tool
though, not on the server.)</div>
<div class="gmail_default"><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
Can we change the management vault somehow to not
need PicketBox at all anymore?<br>
<br>
Carlo<br>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
wildfly-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev</a></blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote></div>