<html><body><div style="font-family: garamond,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000"><div>How is this a Windup issue?<br></div><div><br></div><div><span name="x"></span><br>Robb Greathouse<br>Chief Evangelist<br>Middleware Business Unit<br>JBoss, a Division of Red Hat<br>cellphone 505-507-4906<span name="x"></span><br></div><div><br></div><hr id="zwchr"><blockquote style="border-left:2px solid #1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;">
  
    
  
  
    Are you saying that Furnace change would be needed? I thought Weld
    supports Jandex out of the box and transparently. If not, let's keep
    as a performance reserve.<br>
    <br>
    Ondra<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12.9.2014 17:29, Lincoln Baxter, III
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:CAEp_U4H8Pw-oGuX_fcg53FvnZOPrktt8gHABw_Opdmq3DgeTXQ@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="ltr">I would be happy to see an improvement in the
        furnace-cdi container to support this, when we have time to work
        on it. Right now it's not critical, but it would be nice once
        things settle down after the tech-preview release.</div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Ondrej
          Zizka <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:ozizka@redhat.com" target="_blank">ozizka@redhat.com</a>&gt;</span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">It seems
            that Forge spends considerable time (around 10 seconds on my<br>
            laptop) scanning the classes for annotated types;<br>
            Somehow related to<br>
org.jboss.forge.furnace.container.cdi.impl.ContainerServiceExtension.processRemoteServiceTypes()<br>
            <br>
            This repeats for each test in which Forge is involved.<br>
            <br>
            Could this scanning be sped up using jandex? If we have 40
            tests, then<br>
            it would buy us over 5 minutes.<br>
            <br>
            Ondra<br>
            <br>
            _______________________________________________<br>
            windup-dev mailing list<br>
            <a href="mailto:windup-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">windup-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
            <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev</a><br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
        <br clear="all">
        <div><br>
        </div>
        -- <br>
        Lincoln Baxter, III<br>
        <a href="http://ocpsoft.org" target="_blank">http://ocpsoft.org</a><br>
        "Simpler is better."
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre>_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:windup-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">windup-dev@lists.jboss.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev</a></pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  

<br>_______________________________________________<br>windup-dev mailing list<br>windup-dev@lists.jboss.org<br>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev</blockquote><div><br></div></div></body></html>