<div dir="ltr">Hey, good question, but no. You can always look in that package and see all of the phases we have. Or use the IDE to quick-search for types implementing RulePhase, etc. Not worth making ugly code for that when the IDE or GitHub will tell you exactly the same information.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Ondrej Zizka <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ozizka@redhat.com" target="_blank">ozizka@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Hi,<br>
<br>
I am updating the quickstarts to match the recent changes<br>
<a href="https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WINDUP-277" target="_blank">WINDUP-277</a> <a href="https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WINDUP-277" target="_blank">Replace
Migration "Phases" with dependencies</a> .<br>
<br>
The subclasses are small and just a few.<br>
Could we move them as inner classes of RulePhase?<br>
This would be beneficial:<br>
1) One could write "RulePhase." to get a list of built-in phases
instead of going to the documentation.<br>
2) We would get rid of several small .java files<br>
<br>
Ondra<br>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
windup-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:windup-dev@lists.jboss.org">windup-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">Lincoln Baxter, III<br><a href="http://ocpsoft.org" target="_blank">http://ocpsoft.org</a><br>"Simpler is better."</div>
</div>