From rramalho at redhat.com  Thu Apr 14 15:11:30 2016
From: rramalho at redhat.com (Rodrigo Ramalho)
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 16:11:30 -0300
Subject: [Windup-users] Option to force "YES" on windup questions
Message-ID: <CA+UxU=RR_p=-zWVEs+SJyYHkz3PMGoPvM0X+bo8EG7yW3giVZw@mail.gmail.com>

Hello, I'm on a big customer with ~400 apps to analyze with windup. I'm
trying to batch execute this analysis but sometime windup prompt:

"The input application is large. Processing may take a very long time.
Please consult the Windup User Guide for performance tips. Would you like
to continue? [Y,n] y"

Is there some option to force this option to always Y?

Thanks
-- 
Rodrigo Ramalho | Solution Architect

T: +55 (21) 2546.9953
M: +55 (21) 9.9988.8029
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/windup-users/attachments/20160414/2b9c9435/attachment.html 

From jsightle at redhat.com  Tue Apr 19 08:16:14 2016
From: jsightle at redhat.com (Jess Sightler)
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 08:16:14 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [Windup-users] Option to force "YES" on windup questions
In-Reply-To: <CA+UxU=RR_p=-zWVEs+SJyYHkz3PMGoPvM0X+bo8EG7yW3giVZw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+UxU=RR_p=-zWVEs+SJyYHkz3PMGoPvM0X+bo8EG7yW3giVZw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1325407118.53179485.1461068174924.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>

The two parameters are "--overwrite" and "--batchMode". This will bypass all questions and override the error about potentially destructive changes.

Keep in mind that if "--overwrite" is specified, anything in the output folder will be deleted at the beginning of processing.

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rodrigo Ramalho" <rramalho at redhat.com>
> To: windup-users at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 3:11:30 PM
> Subject: [Windup-users] Option to force "YES" on windup questions
> 
> Hello, I'm on a big customer with ~400 apps to analyze with windup. I'm
> trying to batch execute this analysis but sometime windup prompt:
> 
> "The input application is large. Processing may take a very long time. Please
> consult the Windup User Guide for performance tips. Would you like to
> continue? [Y,n] y"
> 
> Is there some option to force this option to always Y?
> 
> Thanks
> --
> Rodrigo Ramalho | Solution Architect
> 
> T: +55 (21) 2546.9953
> M: +55 (21) 9.9988.8029
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Windup-users mailing list
> Windup-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-users
> 


From sgilda at redhat.com  Tue Apr 19 09:25:12 2016
From: sgilda at redhat.com (Sande Gilda)
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:25:12 -0400
Subject: [Windup-users] Option to force "YES" on windup questions
In-Reply-To: <1325407118.53179485.1461068174924.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
References: <CA+UxU=RR_p=-zWVEs+SJyYHkz3PMGoPvM0X+bo8EG7yW3giVZw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1325407118.53179485.1461068174924.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <571631B8.6060209@redhat.com>

We should probably update the documentation if this is not clear.

On 04/19/2016 08:16 AM, Jess Sightler wrote:
> The two parameters are "--overwrite" and "--batchMode". This will bypass all questions and override the error about potentially destructive changes.
>
> Keep in mind that if "--overwrite" is specified, anything in the output folder will be deleted at the beginning of processing.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Rodrigo Ramalho" <rramalho at redhat.com>
>> To: windup-users at lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 3:11:30 PM
>> Subject: [Windup-users] Option to force "YES" on windup questions
>>
>> Hello, I'm on a big customer with ~400 apps to analyze with windup. I'm
>> trying to batch execute this analysis but sometime windup prompt:
>>
>> "The input application is large. Processing may take a very long time. Please
>> consult the Windup User Guide for performance tips. Would you like to
>> continue? [Y,n] y"
>>
>> Is there some option to force this option to always Y?
>>
>> Thanks
>> --
>> Rodrigo Ramalho | Solution Architect
>>
>> T: +55 (21) 2546.9953
>> M: +55 (21) 9.9988.8029
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Windup-users mailing list
>> Windup-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Windup-users mailing list
> Windup-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-users



From ozizka at redhat.com  Sun Apr 24 20:19:42 2016
From: ozizka at redhat.com (Ondrej Zizka)
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 02:19:42 +0200
Subject: [Windup-users] Option to force "YES" on windup questions
In-Reply-To: <571631B8.6060209@redhat.com>
References: <CA+UxU=RR_p=-zWVEs+SJyYHkz3PMGoPvM0X+bo8EG7yW3giVZw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1325407118.53179485.1461068174924.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
	<571631B8.6060209@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <571D629E.1000509@redhat.com>

Or maybe add a -y  alias for --batchMode.

Ondra



On 19.4.2016 15:25, Sande Gilda wrote:
> We should probably update the documentation if this is not clear.
>
> On 04/19/2016 08:16 AM, Jess Sightler wrote:
>> The two parameters are "--overwrite" and "--batchMode". This will bypass all questions and override the error about potentially destructive changes.
>>
>> Keep in mind that if "--overwrite" is specified, anything in the output folder will be deleted at the beginning of processing.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Rodrigo Ramalho" <rramalho at redhat.com>
>>> To: windup-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 3:11:30 PM
>>> Subject: [Windup-users] Option to force "YES" on windup questions
>>>
>>> Hello, I'm on a big customer with ~400 apps to analyze with windup. I'm
>>> trying to batch execute this analysis but sometime windup prompt:
>>>
>>> "The input application is large. Processing may take a very long time. Please
>>> consult the Windup User Guide for performance tips. Would you like to
>>> continue? [Y,n] y"
>>>
>>> Is there some option to force this option to always Y?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> --
>>> Rodrigo Ramalho | Solution Architect
>>>
>>> T: +55 (21) 2546.9953
>>> M: +55 (21) 9.9988.8029
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Windup-users mailing list
>>> Windup-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-users
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Windup-users mailing list
>> Windup-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-users
> _______________________________________________
> Windup-users mailing list
> Windup-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-users



From ozizka at redhat.com  Tue Apr 26 10:38:14 2016
From: ozizka at redhat.com (Ondrej Zizka)
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 16:38:14 +0200
Subject: [Windup-users] Are you ready for Java 8? Windup about to move
Message-ID: <571F7D56.6080308@redhat.com>

For various reasons, we would like to move Windup to Java 8.

That would mean that it would not run on Java 7 anymore.

*Is there anyone out there who has Java 7 as a hard requirement?*

If so, we would release 2.6.0 still with Java 7 and move in Windup 3.

But if we don't find anyone depending on Java 7, the 2.6.0 release will 
require Java 8.

Let us know here in the replies, or in IRC #wndup @ FreeeNode, or at 
https://developer.jboss.org/message/955153#955153 .


Regards,
Ondra

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/windup-users/attachments/20160426/3423880f/attachment.html 

From ozizka at redhat.com  Tue Apr 26 20:49:20 2016
From: ozizka at redhat.com (Ondrej Zizka)
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 02:49:20 +0200
Subject: [Windup-users] Are you ready for Java 8? Windup about to move
In-Reply-To: <CAHFLeqvyb1KNFCxTiBpCf46CguWZsBQZqZKsUq-bZ2_dexUkEg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <571F7D56.6080308@redhat.com>
	<CAHFLeqvyb1KNFCxTiBpCf46CguWZsBQZqZKsUq-bZ2_dexUkEg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <57200C90.3050603@redhat.com>

Roman,

On 26.4.2016 21:40, Roman Martin Gil wrote:
> When is it going to be released 2.6.0?
>
> Now in the migration projects we are working Java 7 is a requirement, 
> so in this year we need to use it.
do I understand you correctly that you prefer not to, or can't, install 
Java 8 in parallel, run Windup in Java 8, and the client's application 
with Java 7?

Ondra


>
> So if 2.6.0 is coming soon then we will prefer run under 7, if it is 
> taking more time then we have not problem.
>
> Regards
>
> On Tuesday, 26 April 2016, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka at redhat.com 
> <mailto:ozizka at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     For various reasons, we would like to move Windup to Java 8.
>
>     That would mean that it would not run on Java 7 anymore.
>
>     *Is there anyone out there who has Java 7 as a hard requirement?*
>
>     If so, we would release 2.6.0 still with Java 7 and move in Windup 3.
>
>     But if we don't find anyone depending on Java 7, the 2.6.0 release
>     will require Java 8.
>
>     Let us know here in the replies, or in IRC #wndup @ FreeeNode, or
>     at https://developer.jboss.org/message/955153#955153 .
>
>
>     Regards,
>     Ondra
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> Saludos/Best regards
> ______________________________________________________________________
> *Jose Roman Martin Gil *
> /MW Senior Architect/ | +34 605 926 271 | roman.martin at redhat.com 
> <mailto:roman.martin at redhat.com>
>
> //*Red Hat* Iberia
> C/ Jos? Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta 3?D, 28016 Madrid, Spain
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/windup-users/attachments/20160427/9625a33c/attachment.html 

From rmarting at redhat.com  Tue Apr 26 15:40:12 2016
From: rmarting at redhat.com (Roman Martin Gil)
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 21:40:12 +0200
Subject: [Windup-users] Are you ready for Java 8? Windup about to move
In-Reply-To: <571F7D56.6080308@redhat.com>
References: <571F7D56.6080308@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <CAHFLeqvyb1KNFCxTiBpCf46CguWZsBQZqZKsUq-bZ2_dexUkEg@mail.gmail.com>

When is it going to be released 2.6.0?

Now in the migration projects we are working Java 7 is a requirement, so in
this year we need to use it.

So if 2.6.0 is coming soon then we will prefer run under 7, if it is taking
more time then we have not problem.

Regards

On Tuesday, 26 April 2016, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka at redhat.com> wrote:

> For various reasons, we would like to move Windup to Java 8.
>
> That would mean that it would not run on Java 7 anymore.
>
>
>
> *Is there anyone out there who has Java 7 as a hard requirement?*
>
>
>
> If so, we would release 2.6.0 still with Java 7 and move in Windup 3.
>
> But if we don't find anyone depending on Java 7, the 2.6.0 release will
> require Java 8.
>
>
>
> Let us know here in the replies, or in IRC #wndup @ FreeeNode, or at
> https://developer.jboss.org/message/955153#955153 .
>
>
> Regards,
> Ondra
>


-- 

Saludos/Best regards
______________________________________________________________________
*Jose Roman Martin Gil *
*MW Senior Architect* | +34 605 926 271 | roman.martin at redhat.com

*Red Hat* Iberia
C/ Jos? Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta 3?D, 28016 Madrid, Spain
______________________________________________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/windup-users/attachments/20160426/4f1eede3/attachment.html 

From rmarting at redhat.com  Wed Apr 27 01:14:12 2016
From: rmarting at redhat.com (Roman Martin Gil)
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 07:14:12 +0200
Subject: [Windup-users] Are you ready for Java 8? Windup about to move
In-Reply-To: <57200C90.3050603@redhat.com>
References: <571F7D56.6080308@redhat.com>
	<CAHFLeqvyb1KNFCxTiBpCf46CguWZsBQZqZKsUq-bZ2_dexUkEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<57200C90.3050603@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <CAHFLeqsUk+yWBEbEeBBpu4c=EKh_9n6szfRQ3oBSZ_oA-3dXHg@mail.gmail.com>

We have integrated WindUp with Maven and our Development Lifecycle, and
this process is under Java 7. This is the main reason because we don't use
WindUp by command-line.

I don't want to be a stopper to change to Java 8, so a I good idea is could
be make a version Java7/8 compatible and the next one only in Java 8. This
roadmap es very common in a lot of proyects.

But, when is 2.6.0 version is comming?

Regards

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka at redhat.com> wrote:

> Roman,
>
> On 26.4.2016 21:40, Roman Martin Gil wrote:
>
> When is it going to be released 2.6.0?
>
> Now in the migration projects we are working Java 7 is a requirement, so
> in this year we need to use it.
>
> do I understand you correctly that you prefer not to, or can't, install
> Java 8 in parallel, run Windup in Java 8, and the client's application with
> Java 7?
>
> Ondra
>
>
>
> So if 2.6.0 is coming soon then we will prefer run under 7, if it is
> taking more time then we have not problem.
>
> Regards
>
> On Tuesday, 26 April 2016, Ondrej Zizka < <ozizka at redhat.com>
> ozizka at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> For various reasons, we would like to move Windup to Java 8.
>>
>> That would mean that it would not run on Java 7 anymore.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Is there anyone out there who has Java 7 as a hard requirement?*
>>
>>
>>
>> If so, we would release 2.6.0 still with Java 7 and move in Windup 3.
>>
>> But if we don't find anyone depending on Java 7, the 2.6.0 release will
>> require Java 8.
>>
>>
>>
>> Let us know here in the replies, or in IRC #wndup @ FreeeNode, or at
>> <https://developer.jboss.org/message/955153#955153>
>> https://developer.jboss.org/message/955153#955153 .
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ondra
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Saludos/Best regards
> ______________________________________________________________________
> *Jose Roman Martin Gil *
> *MW Senior Architect* | +34 605 926 271 | <roman.martin at redhat.com>
> roman.martin at redhat.com
>
> *Red Hat* Iberia
> C/ Jos? Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta 3?D, 28016 Madrid, Spain
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>


-- 

Saludos/Best regards
______________________________________________________________________
*Jose Roman Martin Gil *
*MW Senior Architect* | +34 605 926 271 | roman.martin at redhat.com

*Red Hat* Iberia
C/ Jos? Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta 3?D, 28016 Madrid, Spain
______________________________________________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/windup-users/attachments/20160427/0d97245a/attachment.html 

From ozizka at redhat.com  Wed Apr 27 11:13:15 2016
From: ozizka at redhat.com (Ondrej Zizka)
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 17:13:15 +0200
Subject: [Windup-users] Are you ready for Java 8? Windup about to move
In-Reply-To: <CAHFLeqsUk+yWBEbEeBBpu4c=EKh_9n6szfRQ3oBSZ_oA-3dXHg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <571F7D56.6080308@redhat.com>
	<CAHFLeqvyb1KNFCxTiBpCf46CguWZsBQZqZKsUq-bZ2_dexUkEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<57200C90.3050603@redhat.com>
	<CAHFLeqsUk+yWBEbEeBBpu4c=EKh_9n6szfRQ3oBSZ_oA-3dXHg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5720D70B.6090505@redhat.com>



On 27.4.2016 07:14, Roman Martin Gil wrote:
> We have integrated WindUp with Maven and our Development Lifecycle, 
> and this process is under Java 7. This is the main reason because we 
> don't use WindUp by command-line.
>
> I don't want to be a stopper to change to Java 8, so a I good idea is 
> could be make a version Java7/8 compatible and the next one only in 
> Java 8. This roadmap es very common in a lot of proyects.
Ok, no problem. Speaking for myself, it's not a stopper. We can do 2.6.0 
with Java 7.
>
> But, when is 2.6.0 version is comming?
No guarantees, I think within a month, but Dan Smith will tell you the 
actual plans.

Ondra


>
> Regards
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka at redhat.com 
> <mailto:ozizka at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     Roman,
>
>     On 26.4.2016 21:40, Roman Martin Gil wrote:
>>     When is it going to be released 2.6.0?
>>
>>     Now in the migration projects we are working Java 7 is a
>>     requirement, so in this year we need to use it.
>     do I understand you correctly that you prefer not to, or can't,
>     install Java 8 in parallel, run Windup in Java 8, and the client's
>     application with Java 7?
>
>     Ondra
>
>
>>
>>     So if 2.6.0 is coming soon then we will prefer run under 7, if it
>>     is taking more time then we have not problem.
>>
>>     Regards
>>
>>     On Tuesday, 26 April 2016, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka at redhat.com
>>     <mailto:ozizka at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         For various reasons, we would like to move Windup to Java 8.
>>
>>         That would mean that it would not run on Java 7 anymore.
>>
>>         *Is there anyone out there who has Java 7 as a hard requirement?*
>>
>>         If so, we would release 2.6.0 still with Java 7 and move in
>>         Windup 3.
>>
>>         But if we don't find anyone depending on Java 7, the 2.6.0
>>         release will require Java 8.
>>
>>         Let us know here in the replies, or in IRC #wndup @
>>         FreeeNode, or at
>>         https://developer.jboss.org/message/955153#955153 .
>>
>>
>>         Regards,
>>         Ondra
>>
>>
>>
>>     -- 
>>
>>     Saludos/Best regards
>>     ______________________________________________________________________
>>
>>     *Jose Roman Martin Gil *
>>     /MW Senior Architect/ | +34 605 926 271
>>     <tel:%2B34%20605%20926%20271> | roman.martin at redhat.com
>>     <mailto:roman.martin at redhat.com>
>>
>>     //*Red Hat* Iberia
>>     C/ Jos? Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta 3?D, 28016
>>     Madrid, Spain
>>     ______________________________________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> Saludos/Best regards
> ______________________________________________________________________
> *Jose Roman Martin Gil *
> /MW Senior Architect/ | +34 605 926 271 | roman.martin at redhat.com 
> <mailto:roman.martin at redhat.com>
>
> //*Red Hat* Iberia
> C/ Jos? Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta 3?D, 28016 Madrid, Spain
> ______________________________________________________________________
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/windup-users/attachments/20160427/53f70b33/attachment.html 

From dansmit at redhat.com  Wed Apr 27 11:30:39 2016
From: dansmit at redhat.com (Dan Smith)
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 11:30:39 -0400
Subject: [Windup-users] Are you ready for Java 8? Windup about to move
In-Reply-To: <5720D70B.6090505@redhat.com>
References: <571F7D56.6080308@redhat.com>
	<CAHFLeqvyb1KNFCxTiBpCf46CguWZsBQZqZKsUq-bZ2_dexUkEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<57200C90.3050603@redhat.com>
	<CAHFLeqsUk+yWBEbEeBBpu4c=EKh_9n6szfRQ3oBSZ_oA-3dXHg@mail.gmail.com>
	<5720D70B.6090505@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <CAHBrnA=x_3=sh=hfbuWT+=zAwxSZcBrechK7fXHR738jPOCdDQ@mail.gmail.com>

We pushed a release candidate for 2.5.0 today but it will be a few weeks
until it is GA. The 2.6.0 release will be about a month behind that.

I think we should plan on giving a little bit longer window before we drop
Java 7 support, but if we could drop it in the next 3-6 months without
causing anyone problems that would be nice.


On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 27.4.2016 07:14, Roman Martin Gil wrote:
>
> We have integrated WindUp with Maven and our Development Lifecycle, and
> this process is under Java 7. This is the main reason because we don't use
> WindUp by command-line.
>
> I don't want to be a stopper to change to Java 8, so a I good idea is
> could be make a version Java7/8 compatible and the next one only in Java 8.
> This roadmap es very common in a lot of proyects.
>
> Ok, no problem. Speaking for myself, it's not a stopper. We can do 2.6.0
> with Java 7.
>
>
> But, when is 2.6.0 version is comming?
>
> No guarantees, I think within a month, but Dan Smith will tell you the
> actual plans.
>
> Ondra
>
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Roman,
>>
>> On 26.4.2016 21:40, Roman Martin Gil wrote:
>>
>> When is it going to be released 2.6.0?
>>
>> Now in the migration projects we are working Java 7 is a requirement, so
>> in this year we need to use it.
>>
>> do I understand you correctly that you prefer not to, or can't, install
>> Java 8 in parallel, run Windup in Java 8, and the client's application with
>> Java 7?
>>
>> Ondra
>>
>>
>>
>> So if 2.6.0 is coming soon then we will prefer run under 7, if it is
>> taking more time then we have not problem.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> On Tuesday, 26 April 2016, Ondrej Zizka < <ozizka at redhat.com>
>> ozizka at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> For various reasons, we would like to move Windup to Java 8.
>>>
>>> That would mean that it would not run on Java 7 anymore.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Is there anyone out there who has Java 7 as a hard requirement?*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If so, we would release 2.6.0 still with Java 7 and move in Windup 3.
>>>
>>> But if we don't find anyone depending on Java 7, the 2.6.0 release will
>>> require Java 8.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Let us know here in the replies, or in IRC #wndup @ FreeeNode, or at
>>> https://developer.jboss.org/message/955153#955153 .
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Ondra
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Saludos/Best regards
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> *Jose Roman Martin Gil *
>> *MW Senior Architect* | +34 605 926 271 <%2B34%20605%20926%20271> |
>> <roman.martin at redhat.com>roman.martin at redhat.com
>>
>> *Red Hat* Iberia
>> C/ Jos? Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta 3?D, 28016 Madrid, Spain
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Saludos/Best regards
> ______________________________________________________________________
> *Jose Roman Martin Gil *
> *MW Senior Architect* | +34 605 926 271 | <roman.martin at redhat.com>
> roman.martin at redhat.com
>
> *Red Hat* Iberia
> C/ Jos? Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta 3?D, 28016 Madrid, Spain
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/windup-users/attachments/20160427/38fd12ad/attachment.html 

From rmarting at redhat.com  Wed Apr 27 11:37:34 2016
From: rmarting at redhat.com (Roman Martin Gil)
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 17:37:34 +0200
Subject: [Windup-users] Are you ready for Java 8? Windup about to move
In-Reply-To: <CAHBrnA=x_3=sh=hfbuWT+=zAwxSZcBrechK7fXHR738jPOCdDQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <571F7D56.6080308@redhat.com>
	<CAHFLeqvyb1KNFCxTiBpCf46CguWZsBQZqZKsUq-bZ2_dexUkEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<57200C90.3050603@redhat.com>
	<CAHFLeqsUk+yWBEbEeBBpu4c=EKh_9n6szfRQ3oBSZ_oA-3dXHg@mail.gmail.com>
	<5720D70B.6090505@redhat.com>
	<CAHBrnA=x_3=sh=hfbuWT+=zAwxSZcBrechK7fXHR738jPOCdDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHFLequi9H7boSNBnF+OYmDU5CtwZZKBEgYoV1RbBMtESRx6Vg@mail.gmail.com>

Which RC version did you release? To test it .

The next 3/6 months will be enought for us working with Java 7, after that
it will be not needed because we will close the migration project (I hope )

Thank you very much for your help.

Regards

On Wednesday, 27 April 2016, Dan Smith <dansmit at redhat.com> wrote:

> We pushed a release candidate for 2.5.0 today but it will be a few weeks
> until it is GA. The 2.6.0 release will be about a month behind that.
>
> I think we should plan on giving a little bit longer window before we drop
> Java 7 support, but if we could drop it in the next 3-6 months without
> causing anyone problems that would be nice.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka at redhat.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ozizka at redhat.com');>> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 27.4.2016 07:14, Roman Martin Gil wrote:
>>
>> We have integrated WindUp with Maven and our Development Lifecycle, and
>> this process is under Java 7. This is the main reason because we don't use
>> WindUp by command-line.
>>
>> I don't want to be a stopper to change to Java 8, so a I good idea is
>> could be make a version Java7/8 compatible and the next one only in Java 8.
>> This roadmap es very common in a lot of proyects.
>>
>> Ok, no problem. Speaking for myself, it's not a stopper. We can do 2.6.0
>> with Java 7.
>>
>>
>> But, when is 2.6.0 version is comming?
>>
>> No guarantees, I think within a month, but Dan Smith will tell you the
>> actual plans.
>>
>> Ondra
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka at redhat.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ozizka at redhat.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>> Roman,
>>>
>>> On 26.4.2016 21:40, Roman Martin Gil wrote:
>>>
>>> When is it going to be released 2.6.0?
>>>
>>> Now in the migration projects we are working Java 7 is a requirement, so
>>> in this year we need to use it.
>>>
>>> do I understand you correctly that you prefer not to, or can't, install
>>> Java 8 in parallel, run Windup in Java 8, and the client's application with
>>> Java 7?
>>>
>>> Ondra
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So if 2.6.0 is coming soon then we will prefer run under 7, if it is
>>> taking more time then we have not problem.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, 26 April 2016, Ondrej Zizka <
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ozizka at redhat.com');>ozizka at redhat.com
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ozizka at redhat.com');>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> For various reasons, we would like to move Windup to Java 8.
>>>>
>>>> That would mean that it would not run on Java 7 anymore.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Is there anyone out there who has Java 7 as a hard requirement?*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If so, we would release 2.6.0 still with Java 7 and move in Windup 3.
>>>>
>>>> But if we don't find anyone depending on Java 7, the 2.6.0 release will
>>>> require Java 8.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Let us know here in the replies, or in IRC #wndup @ FreeeNode, or at
>>>> https://developer.jboss.org/message/955153#955153 .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Ondra
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Saludos/Best regards
>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>> *Jose Roman Martin Gil *
>>> *MW Senior Architect* | +34 605 926 271 <%2B34%20605%20926%20271> |
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','roman.martin at redhat.com');>
>>> roman.martin at redhat.com
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','roman.martin at redhat.com');>
>>>
>>> *Red Hat* Iberia
>>> C/ Jos? Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta 3?D, 28016 Madrid,
>>> Spain
>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Saludos/Best regards
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> *Jose Roman Martin Gil *
>> *MW Senior Architect* | +34 605 926 271 |
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','roman.martin at redhat.com');>
>> roman.martin at redhat.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','roman.martin at redhat.com');>
>>
>> *Red Hat* Iberia
>> C/ Jos? Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta 3?D, 28016 Madrid, Spain
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>

-- 

Saludos/Best regards
______________________________________________________________________
*Jose Roman Martin Gil *
*MW Senior Architect* | +34 605 926 271 | roman.martin at redhat.com

*Red Hat* Iberia
C/ Jos? Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta 3?D, 28016 Madrid, Spain
______________________________________________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/windup-users/attachments/20160427/c061303e/attachment.html 

From jsightle at redhat.com  Wed Apr 27 12:03:45 2016
From: jsightle at redhat.com (Jess Sightler)
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:03:45 -0400
Subject: [Windup-users] Are you ready for Java 8? Windup about to move
In-Reply-To: <CAHFLequi9H7boSNBnF+OYmDU5CtwZZKBEgYoV1RbBMtESRx6Vg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <571F7D56.6080308@redhat.com>
	<CAHFLeqvyb1KNFCxTiBpCf46CguWZsBQZqZKsUq-bZ2_dexUkEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<57200C90.3050603@redhat.com>
	<CAHFLeqsUk+yWBEbEeBBpu4c=EKh_9n6szfRQ3oBSZ_oA-3dXHg@mail.gmail.com>
	<5720D70B.6090505@redhat.com>
	<CAHBrnA=x_3=sh=hfbuWT+=zAwxSZcBrechK7fXHR738jPOCdDQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHFLequi9H7boSNBnF+OYmDU5CtwZZKBEgYoV1RbBMtESRx6Vg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5720E2E1.9080003@redhat.com>

Ok, that makes sense to me. Maybe we can schedule Java 8 related 
features for the next version after 2.6.

On 04/27/2016 11:37 AM, Roman Martin Gil wrote:
> Which RC version did you release? To test it .
>
> The next 3/6 months will be enought for us working with Java 7, after 
> that it will be not needed because we will close the migration project 
> (I hope )
>
> Thank you very much for your help.
>
> Regards
>
> On Wednesday, 27 April 2016, Dan Smith <dansmit at redhat.com 
> <mailto:dansmit at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     We pushed a release candidate for 2.5.0 today but it will be a few
>     weeks until it is GA. The 2.6.0 release will be about a month
>     behind that.
>
>     I think we should plan on giving a little bit longer window before
>     we drop Java 7 support, but if we could drop it in the next 3-6
>     months without causing anyone problems that would be nice.
>
>
>     On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka at redhat.com
>     <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ozizka at redhat.com');>> wrote:
>
>
>
>         On 27.4.2016 07:14, Roman Martin Gil wrote:
>>         We have integrated WindUp with Maven and our Development
>>         Lifecycle, and this process is under Java 7. This is the main
>>         reason because we don't use WindUp by command-line.
>>
>>         I don't want to be a stopper to change to Java 8, so a I good
>>         idea is could be make a version Java7/8 compatible and the
>>         next one only in Java 8. This roadmap es very common in a lot
>>         of proyects.
>         Ok, no problem. Speaking for myself, it's not a stopper. We
>         can do 2.6.0 with Java 7.
>>
>>         But, when is 2.6.0 version is comming?
>         No guarantees, I think within a month, but Dan Smith will tell
>         you the actual plans.
>
>         Ondra
>
>
>
>>
>>         Regards
>>
>>         On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Ondrej Zizka
>>         <ozizka at redhat.com
>>         <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ozizka at redhat.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>             Roman,
>>
>>             On 26.4.2016 21:40, Roman Martin Gil wrote:
>>>             When is it going to be released 2.6.0?
>>>
>>>             Now in the migration projects we are working Java 7 is a
>>>             requirement, so in this year we need to use it.
>>             do I understand you correctly that you prefer not to, or
>>             can't, install Java 8 in parallel, run Windup in Java 8,
>>             and the client's application with Java 7?
>>
>>             Ondra
>>
>>
>>>
>>>             So if 2.6.0 is coming soon then we will prefer run under
>>>             7, if it is taking more time then we have not problem.
>>>
>>>             Regards
>>>
>>>             On Tuesday, 26 April 2016, Ondrej Zizka
>>>             <ozizka at redhat.com
>>>             <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ozizka at redhat.com');>> wrote:
>>>
>>>                 For various reasons, we would like to move Windup to
>>>                 Java 8.
>>>
>>>                 That would mean that it would not run on Java 7 anymore.
>>>
>>>                 *Is there anyone out there who has Java 7 as a hard
>>>                 requirement?*
>>>
>>>                 If so, we would release 2.6.0 still with Java 7 and
>>>                 move in Windup 3.
>>>
>>>                 But if we don't find anyone depending on Java 7, the
>>>                 2.6.0 release will require Java 8.
>>>
>>>                 Let us know here in the replies, or in IRC #wndup @
>>>                 FreeeNode, or at
>>>                 https://developer.jboss.org/message/955153#955153 .
>>>
>>>
>>>                 Regards,
>>>                 Ondra
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>             -- 
>>>
>>>             Saludos/Best regards
>>>             ______________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>>             *Jose Roman Martin Gil *
>>>             /MW Senior Architect/ | +34 605 926 271
>>>             <tel:%2B34%20605%20926%20271> | roman.martin at redhat.com
>>>             <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','roman.martin at redhat.com');>
>>>
>>>             //*Red Hat* Iberia
>>>             C/ Jos? Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta 3?D,
>>>             28016 Madrid, Spain
>>>             ______________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         -- 
>>
>>         Saludos/Best regards
>>         ______________________________________________________________________
>>
>>         *Jose Roman Martin Gil *
>>         /MW Senior Architect/ | +34 605 926 271
>>         <tel:%2B34%20605%20926%20271> | roman.martin at redhat.com
>>         <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','roman.martin at redhat.com');>
>>
>>         //*Red Hat* Iberia
>>         C/ Jos? Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta 3?D, 28016
>>         Madrid, Spain
>>         ______________________________________________________________________
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> Saludos/Best regards
> ______________________________________________________________________
> *Jose Roman Martin Gil *
> /MW Senior Architect/ | +34 605 926 271 | roman.martin at redhat.com 
> <mailto:roman.martin at redhat.com>
>
> //*Red Hat* Iberia
> C/ Jos? Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta 3?D, 28016 Madrid, Spain
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Windup-users mailing list
> Windup-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/windup-users/attachments/20160427/b4ab0065/attachment.html 

From ozizka at redhat.com  Wed Apr 27 16:27:13 2016
From: ozizka at redhat.com (Ondrej Zizka)
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 22:27:13 +0200
Subject: [Windup-users] Are you ready for Java 8? Windup about to move
In-Reply-To: <CAHFLequi9H7boSNBnF+OYmDU5CtwZZKBEgYoV1RbBMtESRx6Vg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <571F7D56.6080308@redhat.com>
	<CAHFLeqvyb1KNFCxTiBpCf46CguWZsBQZqZKsUq-bZ2_dexUkEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<57200C90.3050603@redhat.com>
	<CAHFLeqsUk+yWBEbEeBBpu4c=EKh_9n6szfRQ3oBSZ_oA-3dXHg@mail.gmail.com>
	<5720D70B.6090505@redhat.com>
	<CAHBrnA=x_3=sh=hfbuWT+=zAwxSZcBrechK7fXHR738jPOCdDQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHFLequi9H7boSNBnF+OYmDU5CtwZZKBEgYoV1RbBMtESRx6Vg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <572120A1.90502@redhat.com>

2.5.0.CR3 -> 
http://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/groups/public/org/jboss/windup/windup-distribution/



On 27.4.2016 17:37, Roman Martin Gil wrote:
> Which RC version did you release? To test it .
>
> The next 3/6 months will be enought for us working with Java 7, after 
> that it will be not needed because we will close the migration project 
> (I hope )
>
> Thank you very much for your help.
>
> Regards
>
> On Wednesday, 27 April 2016, Dan Smith <dansmit at redhat.com 
> <mailto:dansmit at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     We pushed a release candidate for 2.5.0 today but it will be a few
>     weeks until it is GA. The 2.6.0 release will be about a month
>     behind that.
>
>     I think we should plan on giving a little bit longer window before
>     we drop Java 7 support, but if we could drop it in the next 3-6
>     months without causing anyone problems that would be nice.
>
>
>     On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka at redhat.com
>     <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ozizka at redhat.com');>> wrote:
>
>
>
>         On 27.4.2016 07:14, Roman Martin Gil wrote:
>>         We have integrated WindUp with Maven and our Development
>>         Lifecycle, and this process is under Java 7. This is the main
>>         reason because we don't use WindUp by command-line.
>>
>>         I don't want to be a stopper to change to Java 8, so a I good
>>         idea is could be make a version Java7/8 compatible and the
>>         next one only in Java 8. This roadmap es very common in a lot
>>         of proyects.
>         Ok, no problem. Speaking for myself, it's not a stopper. We
>         can do 2.6.0 with Java 7.
>>
>>         But, when is 2.6.0 version is comming?
>         No guarantees, I think within a month, but Dan Smith will tell
>         you the actual plans.
>
>         Ondra
>
>
>
>>
>>         Regards
>>
>>         On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Ondrej Zizka
>>         <ozizka at redhat.com
>>         <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ozizka at redhat.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>             Roman,
>>
>>             On 26.4.2016 21:40, Roman Martin Gil wrote:
>>>             When is it going to be released 2.6.0?
>>>
>>>             Now in the migration projects we are working Java 7 is a
>>>             requirement, so in this year we need to use it.
>>             do I understand you correctly that you prefer not to, or
>>             can't, install Java 8 in parallel, run Windup in Java 8,
>>             and the client's application with Java 7?
>>
>>             Ondra
>>
>>
>>>
>>>             So if 2.6.0 is coming soon then we will prefer run under
>>>             7, if it is taking more time then we have not problem.
>>>
>>>             Regards
>>>
>>>             On Tuesday, 26 April 2016, Ondrej Zizka
>>>             <ozizka at redhat.com
>>>             <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ozizka at redhat.com');>> wrote:
>>>
>>>                 For various reasons, we would like to move Windup to
>>>                 Java 8.
>>>
>>>                 That would mean that it would not run on Java 7 anymore.
>>>
>>>                 *Is there anyone out there who has Java 7 as a hard
>>>                 requirement?*
>>>
>>>                 If so, we would release 2.6.0 still with Java 7 and
>>>                 move in Windup 3.
>>>
>>>                 But if we don't find anyone depending on Java 7, the
>>>                 2.6.0 release will require Java 8.
>>>
>>>                 Let us know here in the replies, or in IRC #wndup @
>>>                 FreeeNode, or at
>>>                 https://developer.jboss.org/message/955153#955153 .
>>>
>>>
>>>                 Regards,
>>>                 Ondra
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>             -- 
>>>
>>>             Saludos/Best regards
>>>             ______________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>>             *Jose Roman Martin Gil *
>>>             /MW Senior Architect/ | +34 605 926 271
>>>             <tel:%2B34%20605%20926%20271> | roman.martin at redhat.com
>>>             <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','roman.martin at redhat.com');>
>>>
>>>             //*Red Hat* Iberia
>>>             C/ Jos? Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta 3?D,
>>>             28016 Madrid, Spain
>>>             ______________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         -- 
>>
>>         Saludos/Best regards
>>         ______________________________________________________________________
>>
>>         *Jose Roman Martin Gil *
>>         /MW Senior Architect/ | +34 605 926 271
>>         <tel:%2B34%20605%20926%20271> | roman.martin at redhat.com
>>         <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','roman.martin at redhat.com');>
>>
>>         //*Red Hat* Iberia
>>         C/ Jos? Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta 3?D, 28016
>>         Madrid, Spain
>>         ______________________________________________________________________
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> Saludos/Best regards
> ______________________________________________________________________
> *Jose Roman Martin Gil *
> /MW Senior Architect/ | +34 605 926 271 | roman.martin at redhat.com 
> <mailto:roman.martin at redhat.com>
>
> //*Red Hat* Iberia
> C/ Jos? Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta 3?D, 28016 Madrid, Spain
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/windup-users/attachments/20160427/79463c29/attachment.html 

From ozizka at redhat.com  Wed Apr 27 16:29:06 2016
From: ozizka at redhat.com (Ondrej Zizka)
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 22:29:06 +0200
Subject: [Windup-users] Are you ready for Java 8? Windup about to move
In-Reply-To: <572120A1.90502@redhat.com>
References: <571F7D56.6080308@redhat.com>
	<CAHFLeqvyb1KNFCxTiBpCf46CguWZsBQZqZKsUq-bZ2_dexUkEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<57200C90.3050603@redhat.com>
	<CAHFLeqsUk+yWBEbEeBBpu4c=EKh_9n6szfRQ3oBSZ_oA-3dXHg@mail.gmail.com>
	<5720D70B.6090505@redhat.com>
	<CAHBrnA=x_3=sh=hfbuWT+=zAwxSZcBrechK7fXHR738jPOCdDQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHFLequi9H7boSNBnF+OYmDU5CtwZZKBEgYoV1RbBMtESRx6Vg@mail.gmail.com>
	<572120A1.90502@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <57212112.4070301@redhat.com>

Just a note that there was a bug found right after, so there will be a 
CR4 soon.

Ondra

On 27.4.2016 22:27, Ondrej Zizka wrote:
> 2.5.0.CR3 -> 
> http://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/groups/public/org/jboss/windup/windup-distribution/
>
>
>
> On 27.4.2016 17:37, Roman Martin Gil wrote:
>> Which RC version did you release? To test it .
>>
>> The next 3/6 months will be enought for us working with Java 7, after 
>> that it will be not needed because we will close the migration 
>> project (I hope )
>>
>> Thank you very much for your help.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> On Wednesday, 27 April 2016, Dan Smith <dansmit at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>     We pushed a release candidate for 2.5.0 today but it will be a
>>     few weeks until it is GA. The 2.6.0 release will be about a month
>>     behind that.
>>
>>     I think we should plan on giving a little bit longer window
>>     before we drop Java 7 support, but if we could drop it in the
>>     next 3-6 months without causing anyone problems that would be nice.
>>
>>
>>     On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Ondrej Zizka
>>     <ozizka at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>         On 27.4.2016 07:14, Roman Martin Gil wrote:
>>>         We have integrated WindUp with Maven and our Development
>>>         Lifecycle, and this process is under Java 7. This is the
>>>         main reason because we don't use WindUp by command-line.
>>>
>>>         I don't want to be a stopper to change to Java 8, so a I
>>>         good idea is could be make a version Java7/8 compatible and
>>>         the next one only in Java 8. This roadmap es very common in
>>>         a lot of proyects.
>>         Ok, no problem. Speaking for myself, it's not a stopper. We
>>         can do 2.6.0 with Java 7.
>>>
>>>         But, when is 2.6.0 version is comming?
>>         No guarantees, I think within a month, but Dan Smith will
>>         tell you the actual plans.
>>
>>         Ondra
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>         Regards
>>>
>>>         On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Ondrej Zizka
>>>         <ozizka at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>             Roman,
>>>
>>>             On 26.4.2016 21:40, Roman Martin Gil wrote:
>>>>             When is it going to be released 2.6.0?
>>>>
>>>>             Now in the migration projects we are working Java 7 is
>>>>             a requirement, so in this year we need to use it.
>>>             do I understand you correctly that you prefer not to, or
>>>             can't, install Java 8 in parallel, run Windup in Java 8,
>>>             and the client's application with Java 7?
>>>
>>>             Ondra
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>             So if 2.6.0 is coming soon then we will prefer run
>>>>             under 7, if it is taking more time then we have not
>>>>             problem.
>>>>
>>>>             Regards
>>>>
>>>>             On Tuesday, 26 April 2016, Ondrej Zizka
>>>>             <ozizka at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                 For various reasons, we would like to move Windup
>>>>                 to Java 8.
>>>>
>>>>                 That would mean that it would not run on Java 7
>>>>                 anymore.
>>>>
>>>>                 *Is there anyone out there who has Java 7 as a hard
>>>>                 requirement?*
>>>>
>>>>                 If so, we would release 2.6.0 still with Java 7 and
>>>>                 move in Windup 3.
>>>>
>>>>                 But if we don't find anyone depending on Java 7,
>>>>                 the 2.6.0 release will require Java 8.
>>>>
>>>>                 Let us know here in the replies, or in IRC #wndup @
>>>>                 FreeeNode, or at
>>>>                 https://developer.jboss.org/message/955153#955153 .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                 Regards,
>>>>                 Ondra
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             -- 
>>>>
>>>>             Saludos/Best regards
>>>>             ______________________________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>             *Jose Roman Martin Gil *
>>>>             /MW Senior Architect/ | +34 605 926 271
>>>>             <tel:%2B34%20605%20926%20271> | roman.martin at redhat.com
>>>>
>>>>             //*Red Hat* Iberia
>>>>             C/ Jos? Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta 3?D,
>>>>             28016 Madrid, Spain
>>>>             ______________________________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         -- 
>>>
>>>         Saludos/Best regards
>>>         ______________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>>         *Jose Roman Martin Gil *
>>>         /MW Senior Architect/ | +34 605 926 271
>>>         <tel:%2B34%20605%20926%20271> | roman.martin at redhat.com
>>>
>>>         //*Red Hat* Iberia
>>>         C/ Jos? Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta 3?D, 28016
>>>         Madrid, Spain
>>>         ______________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Saludos/Best regards
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> *Jose Roman Martin Gil *
>> /MW Senior Architect/ | +34 605 926 271 | roman.martin at redhat.com
>>
>> //*Red Hat* Iberia
>> C/ Jos? Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta 3?D, 28016 Madrid, 
>> Spain
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/windup-users/attachments/20160427/bf289f9f/attachment.html