On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:24:33 +0200
Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> wrote:

> My thought is that we should complement our existing tests with what they
> have. We don't have to use their tests, but can be good to run them
> manually to verify that we are on track with them.

I'd prefer running tests on regular basis. So either rewriting tests to Java to
match SimplePush code and make them part of it. Or maybe clone their repo and
put .travis.yml that will fetch simplepush server from git and execute tests
against it.

>
>
> On 24 July 2013 09:12, Karel Piwko <kpiwko@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Looks interesting. But both make and Python make me scary ;-).
> >
> > On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:42:18 -0500
> > Kris Borchers <kris.borchers@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > All (but specifically Dan),
> > >
> > > Thought this might be of interest. It looks like it may be a pretty
> > thorough
> > > set of tests from the Mozilla folks for their Go server.
> > >
> > > https://github.com/jrconlin/simplepush_test
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev