On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Jay Balunas <jbalunas@redhat.com> wrote:

On Feb 20, 2014, at 12:06 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno@abstractj.org> wrote:

Hylke amazing work, I can’t wait to see it in production.

+1 Hylke - good stuff, and a lot to get through!

it looks brilliant!


On February 20, 2014 at 11:06:34 AM, Hylke Bons (hbons@redhat.com) wrote:

TL;DR: The most important questions that we need to answer are  
- "If I download a library on one platform, what must I download  
to use
the same features on an other platform?"

I like this approach.  I'd rather be feature driven than library driven.  I think most yours will be looking for what we can do for them before looking at what native libs we provide.

Not sure - I guess both;

If I need a sync client, I ususally have a client platform already in mind, rather than just looking for sync.

I'd be looking for "iOS sync" 


Lets get this breakdown together for Hylke - using the eitherpad or a gist seems the best approach here.

-"Is this a part I use on the client, or on the server side?”

Not sure if I understood your question correctly, but to get the full solution, you need to download both

I think he means for each feature is there a client and a server part and if so how do we offer them.  Then we can get the info and links for the solution in one place.  Hylke - is that it or something else?

-"What do we mean when talking about different AeroGear

By subprojects I understand as exactly like you did at https://raw2.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/website-restructure/aerogear-modules.png.

One solution might be:
I've made a lot of assumptions here, and it might not work, but  
I'd like
to hear your thoughts on it.

It would clarify a lot if we could harmonise the different downloads  
across platforms, either by providing single download solutions  
splitting everything up and naming all the parts consistently.  
interested in what the technical issues might be, as I wasn't  
when most of these decisions were made, or I simply missed them.  

Thoughts or other ideas? :)

I don’t have any idea, because I liked the way how it was organized. No disagreement here.

+1 keep up the good work!


aerogear-dev mailing list

aerogear-dev mailing list

aerogear-dev mailing list

Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf