a few more questions

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
Hi Idel,

these ideas sound extremely awesome, and I agree they are a logic next steps on the ground work of your project last year. The WebPush Server needs updates too, to be compliant to latest version of the spec, right?

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:15 AM, Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello community!

I'm happy to work with you during the last year! Thank you for the great project! I use it for the pleasured Open Source development when I have free time and I use UPS with my own projects at work.

I'm highly motivated to continue my work on WebPush protocol and move it to UPS!

Expected results for GSoC 2016 project:
  • Add WebPush support for Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox and Safari browsers into UPS.
  • Integrate AeroGear WebPush server with UnifiedPush Server.
  • Good test coverage for the new code.
  • Documentation for all new developments and changes.
  • Demo application for showing the work of WebPush protocol in action with UPS!
I think we could have two demos :)

- pure WebPush, via UPS, to a browser/device
- GCM push, received on WebPush APIs, going through UPS

 

Possible additional tasks which could be done:
  • Java client for AppServer (similar as a current client for User Agents).
  • Rewrite java clients with native Java 9 HTTP/2 API.
what clients do you mean ? 
 
  • Port webpush-codec directly to Netty. It will simplify WebPush Server code base and attract other developers to improve the core of the protocol.
Glad to see your feedback!

Best regards,
Idel Pivnitskiy
--

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf