>One of my concerns with Couch is it is another application/server/dependency to package and keep up with.
The suggestion is that we do something similar to CouchDB and perhaps lend some ideas from their protocol and how they handle conflicts. Not that we base this on CouchDB, sorry if this was confusing. 
A server implementation might start off delegating to a CouchDB instance just to get up and running. This way our client libs would have something work against.  

On 11 December 2013 15:47, Summers Pittman <supittma@redhat.com> wrote:
On 12/11/2013 04:44 AM, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
> Very very very simple with CounchDB +4242424242
One of my concerns with Couch is it is another
application/server/dependency to package and keep up with.

Of course if we want to build an aerogear-sync-server application
instead of an aerogear-sync-sererver spec that servers can implement it
makes a lot more sense.

Can CouchDB be embedded in a Java EE application?
aerogear-dev mailing list