On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno@abstractj.org> wrote:
Good morning peeps,

While I was navigating at angular branch
(https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/angular_keycloak), I notice
that you guys don't make use of keycloak.js

you guys ? :) it's more a 'we' are not using it ;-)


I was following this demo template from Bill:
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/tree/master/project-integrations/aerogear-ups

No usage of keycloak.js there ;)


 
(http://docs.jboss.org/keycloak/docs/1.0-alpha-3/userguide/html_single/index.html#d4e546). My
question is: why not? Or this something planned for the future?


sure, talking to Stian on IRC I got the impression it's good to be used

 

My concern is about reinvent what KC already did on the client side.

yep, fully agree - I can't access JIRA atm, otherwise I'd have created a "keycloak.js usage" item under the AGPUSH-568 epic


 

--

abstractj
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf