Maybe we should specify versions per dependency to avoid troubles in the
future.

Thoughts?

Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> works here too, but not sure if that is really 'correct';
>
> According to Kris (on IRC), something changed during our release so
> that 'ruby-1.9.3-p429' is now required.
>
> I guess I let the Ruby lovers clear up that.
>
> @Erik: thanks - now I can at least build the site :-)
>

--
abstractj



_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev