Not sure if I agree with that or not. Especially since the JS docs are generated from comments in the source, I would think that documentation issues should be reported here. Anyone else have an opinion?

On May 22, 2013, at 2:09 PM, Daniel Passos <daniel@passos.me> wrote:

I don't know but I think maybe docs is umbrella on AeroGear

On May 22, 2013 3:58 PM, "Kris Borchers" <kris.borchers@gmail.com> wrote:

I would like to start creating components for the AGJS project in JIRA. Here is the list I have come up with. Please comment, agree, add, remove as you see fit.

auth
pipeline
datamanager
courier
showcase
examples
docs
grunt-build
builder-node
builder-UI
dist <= this is for our dist build/repo
CI
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev