On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx@qmx.me> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 06:08:21AM +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> However not sure if this name implies the client is also responsible to
> create PushApplications/Variants.
>
> But it is really just a java version of a "sender"
What is a sender? I mean, it lacks context ;)

Ok, but not sure how to improve that, without a mouthful :-)
I guess we can go with "unified-push-java-client", that's just fine for me. 


If this is only a sender, the nodejs client and this should be renamed,
even at repository level, right? 

--
qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf