On Mar 20, 2014, at 1:18 PM, tolis emmanouilidis <tolisemm@gmail.com> wrote:

+1 for ES6

Do you think that ES6 classes will affect the way AeroGear.js library is structured?

maybe a little in the way we do inheritance.   


Thanks,
Tolis


2014-03-20 16:50 GMT+02:00 Bruno Oliveira <bruno@abstractj.org>:
go for it, can’t wait for ES7 and have a branch named “LEGEN…WAIT FOR IT…DARY!"

--
abstractj

On March 20, 2014 at 11:31:23 AM, Lucas Holmquist (lholmqui@redhat.com) wrote:
> > Hey peeps,
>
> I've been seeing libraries such and Angular and Ember starting
> to author in ES6( the next iteration of javascript ) and then transpiling
> back to ES5( the current iteration of javascript ).
>
> So i've created a new branch called "get_to_tha_choppa" that
> will be tracking these changes to see if we can benefit from this.
>
> this could also help us in the quest for AMD/Browser Modules/New
> Fancy Term
>
> some related JIRA
>
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGJS-149
>
> incase people don't get the "get_to_tha_choppa" reference
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs_OacEq2Sk
>
>
> -Luke


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev