Idel,

on the Mozilla #push channel, I got pointed to this newer draft:

https://unicorn-wg.github.io/webpush-protocol/

On that channel kitcambridge told me that the nightly FF is doing webpush, instead of simplepush, when setting 'dom.push.serverURL, to an HTTPs endpoint, following the above mentioned draft.

-Matthias

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello Martin, Elio and Brian,

Thanks for the great work on WebPush protocol!

I'm a student of NRNU MEPhI and this year I take part in GSoC [1] with AeroGear team [2]. I'm working on experimental project, which is called "Aerogear WebPush Server" [3].

I'm watching for updates of WebPush protocol and discussions in this mailing list and I will update our project to support the latest version.

I want to know about your current plans, when do you plan to release a new draft? Maybe you know an approximate month?

Best regards,

Idel Pivnitskiy

[1] https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2015

[2] https://aerogear.org/

[3] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-webpush-server

-- 

E-mail: Idel.Pivnitskiy@gmail.com

Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy

GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

--

Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev