On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx@qmx.me> wrote:

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 02:28:47PM -0400, Jay Balunas wrote:
> One question that came up around the JMS stuff is how will it work on
> top of plain old Tomcat?  Will we be including the extra libs for that
> case?  Or perhaps that functionality is only available if JMS is part
> of the container?

That's exactly why I was unhappy with this change =/

fair point, right now JMS is not used for much.

Once a request hits the server (e.g. request against our HTTP sender API), we produce a JMS message and send a "JOB Submitted" 200 HTTP request.

The consumer for the JMS message does all the work that _may_ take longer, and is blocking IO (->JPA).

E.g. it looks up the MobileVariantInances and is responsible for delivering the messages to the actual push networks (GCM/APNs).

I think, that we can remove the JMS part, at least for now. (e.g. for the early August release). However, I am sure, that at some point messaging will helpful for scaling/throughput.

For now, we could use CDI events in combination with the @Asynchronous EJB annotation (for publishing and receiving).

would that be OK ?

-M

 

--
qmx

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev