On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
Hi Doug,



On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx@qmx.me> wrote:


On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:

back to one schema, for 1.1.0 and do clean separation on 1.2.0?

Worksforme(tm)

+1

ok, cool - I'd say - let's do that.

So, since the KC part (e.g. new Keycloak versions), is covered by themselves, something like this [1] is not a huge issue, right? At least that's my understanding/assumption.

FYI - the KC version on master is now on 1.2.0.CR1 - but incase this has _negative_ effect for your migration work, please let us know. I think going back to an older version of KC is not a show stopper at all

-M 

Related, we already have a vage epic to cover the separation, I have moved that to 1.2.0


 


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf