Ok... :)

not sure the repos really need the aerogear- (talking about JUST the repo name), but that's not really that important...

for consistency, why not ?

aerogear-simplepush-server

aerogear-push-ios-demo
aerogear-push-registration-ios
aerogear-unified-push
aerogear-unified-push-java-client

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:

yeah, these names do make sense!

+1

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx@qmx.me> wrote:

So the repo names so far:

aerogear-push-ios-demo
aerogear-simplepush-server
push-registration-ios
unified-push
unified-push-java-client

I'd like to do another quick run on it, this time asking about
consistency ;)

Thoughts?

--
qmx

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf