On 01/16/2013 10:31 AM, Sebastien Blanc
wrote:
But maybe we don't want the same timeout for a GET
than for a POST ?
Maybe we don't, but I think this may fall under KISS.
And if it ends up people need it we can add it in later.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:30 PM,
Matthias Wessendorf
<matzew@apache.org> wrote:
pipe
level. POST can timeout too ;-)
On Wednesday, January 16, 2013, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
the
timeout parameter would be a general property of
read() and not related to Paging ?
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at
4:25 PM, Summers Pittman
<supittma@redhat.com>
wrote:
On 01/16/2013 10:23 AM, Bruno Oliveira
wrote:
> Good point Summers. Might be an obvious
question, but there we go. Are we planning to
include timeout as parameter? For example: I
want to retrieve a list of a bazilion users,
and I want to specify the timeout acceptable
to wait.
>
> I didn't get the chance to look at each
API, just double checking here.
>
+1
I was thinking about this yesterday. I want to
but was hoping we could
get the "shape" of the API nailed down first
before we started hammering
on specifics.
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________